Fair Value Calculator Fair Value Calculator
EN DE

0444 (0444) Fair Value & Analysis

Consumer Cyclical · Market cap HK$60.4M

0 0444 0444 · HK
PriceHK$0.0100
Fair ValueHK$0.0130
Upside+30.0%
Quality52/100
Evidence: Medium Range HK$0.0130 – HK$0.0130

Fair value as of: Jul 1, 2026

From 9 valuation models · updated today

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

HK$0.0100 HK$0.0100 Fair Value HK$0.0130 Jun 2025 Jun 2026

12‑month range HK$0.0100 – HK$0.0100 · the HK$0.0100 price screens below the HK$0.0130 fair value. As of Jul 1, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

0444 (0444) currently trades at HK$0.0100, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$0.0130 — implying the stock looks roughly 30.0% undervalued today. We read business quality at 52/100 (solid quality), in the Consumer Cyclical sector. Bull case: trading below our estimate, it may offer upside if the fundamentals hold. Bear case: a low price can be a value trap when quality is weak or the data is thin (evidence: medium) — always confirm before acting.

Trailing-twelve-month revenue stands at HK$71.1M. Revenue declined 60.5% year over year. Net debt stands at HK$332M. Fundamentals as of Jul 1, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$71.1M
Revenue growth (YoY) -60.5%
Return on equity -320%
Free cash flow HK$5.2M FY2024
Operating margin -90.9%
Net debt HK$332M FY2024

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 1, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2020 – FY2024 · reported fiscal years

0444 reported revenue of HK$126M in FY2024 versus HK$262M in FY2020, a compound −16.8%/yr. Reported net income was −HK$197M in FY2024.

Revenue −16.8%/yr
FY20 HK$262M
FY21 HK$136M
FY22 HK$149M
FY23 HK$98.2M
FY24 HK$126M
Net income
FY20 −HK$142M
FY21 −HK$210M
FY22 −HK$157M
FY23 −HK$184M
FY24 −HK$197M

Is 0444 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Luxury Goods stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 1, 2026).

Stock Price Fair Value vs Fair Value
LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne, LVMUY $110.06 $106.54 -3%
Hermès International Société en commandite par actions HESAY $184.96 $105.66 -43%
Compagnie Financière Richemont SA CFRHF $225.92 $143.35 -37%
Christian Dior SE CHDRY $129.80 $151.76 +17%
Titan Company TITAN ₹4,042 ₹1,546 -62%
Kering SA PPRUF $318.73 $86.66 -73%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Consumer Cyclical stocks →

All undervalued stocks TechnologyFinancial ServicesHealthcareConsumer CyclicalConsumer DefensiveCommunication ServicesIndustrialsEnergyBasic MaterialsReal EstateUtilities Deeply Undervalued StocksUndervalued Blue-Chip StocksUndervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 0444 (0444) undervalued?
As of Jul 1, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$0.0130 versus a price of HK$0.0100 — about +30% (undervalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of 0444?
Our model-based fair value for 0444 is HK$0.0130 (as of Jul 1, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$0.0100.
What is the quality score of 0444?
0444 has a Quality Score of 52/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.
What is the revenue of 0444 (0444)?
0444 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$71.1M (latest available figure, as of Jul 1, 2026).
What is the net profit margin of 0444?
The net profit margin of 0444 is about 0.0%, meaning it keeps roughly 0.0% of revenue as net income. Based on the latest reported figures.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.