EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

China Yangtze Power Co vs EAM Solar ASA: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how China Yangtze Power Co (600900) and EAM Solar ASA (EAM) compare, as of Oct 3, 2026.

As of Oct 3, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees China Yangtze Power Co as the more attractively valued of the two: China Yangtze Power Co trades at ¥28.54 versus a fair value of ¥31.20 (+9.3%), while EAM Solar ASA trades at NOK 0.70 versus NOK 0.20 (−70.9%).
China Yangtze Power Co
600900.SHG · CNY · Utilities
+9.3%
upside to fair value
fairly valued
Price¥28.54
Fair Value¥31.20
Quality58/100
EAM Solar ASA
EAM.OL · NOK · Utilities
−70.9%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceNOK 0.70
Fair ValueNOK 0.20
Quality33/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green is the better side of a row, red the weaker one (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper). Grey rows are for reference only and are not scored.

betterweakerfor reference, not scored

China Yangtze Power CoEAM Solar ASA
Valuation
19.3×P/E (TTM)2.4×
18.9×Forward P/E (FY2027)n/a
19.2×Median P/E at FY-end (10 FY, ex one-offs where documented)n/a
7.98×P/S (TTM)n/a
3.00×P/Bn/a
13.3×EV/EBITDAn/a
+9.3%Fair value upside−70.9%
2.8%Dividend yieldn/a
¥0.79Dividend per sharen/a
Profitability
53.1%Operating margin-97.6%
0.82×EBIT margin trend (5Y)n/a
16.4%Return on equity64.3%
5.3%Return on assets-1.2%
Growth
0.7%Revenue growth (YoY)-6.3%
8.4%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)-0.1%
8.7%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)-0.8%
+6.7%Value creation/yrn/a
Balance & size
4.4×Interest coverage (EBIT/interest)n/a
0.87×Debt / equityn/a
$104BMarket capn/a
expensiveGrowth qualityweak
China Yangtze Power Co, median P/E at fiscal year-end, 10 fiscal years (2016 to 2025), reported earnings, FY2025 ex one-offs: 19.2.
Forward P/E: price divided by the analyst consensus for the first fiscal year that has not started yet. The current year carries special items from quarters already reported.

China Yangtze Power Co leads: 6 to 1 metric wins.

n/a = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

China Yangtze Power Coof which business quality 54 · market factors 67 EAM Solar ASAof which business quality 33 · market factors 18
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
44
3
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
28
49
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
86
37
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
36
40
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
65
94
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
100
50
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
49
8
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
60
1
Net IssuanceShare count: buybacks or dilution?
69
0

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyChina Yangtze Power CoPrice ¥28.54EAM Solar ASAPrice NOK 0.70
DCF Models−3.1%close to the price¥27.65n/a
Earnings-Based−39.8%below the price¥17.18n/a
Dividend Discount−15.5%below the price¥24.12n/a
Multiples−39.5%below the price¥17.26n/a
Asset-Based−77.6%below the price¥6.38−65.8%below the priceNOK 0.24
Growth DCF−13.5%close to the price¥24.68n/a
Economic Profit−65.6%below the price¥9.82n/a
Growth Earnings−12.8%close to the price¥24.89n/a
Minimum−77.6%below the price¥6.38−65.8%below the priceNOK 0.24
Maximum−3.1%close to the price¥27.65−65.8%below the priceNOK 0.24
Median−27.5%below the price¥20.69−65.8%below the priceNOK 0.24
Geometric mean−39.8%below the price¥17.19−65.8%below the priceNOK 0.24

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

China Yangtze Power Co: 22 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

EAM Solar ASA: 1 of 1 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.

China Yangtze Power Co
Price ¥28.54
Fair Value ¥31.20
Bear ¥21.64Bull ¥40.17
EAM Solar ASA
Price NOK 0.70
Fair Value NOK 0.20
Bear NOK 0.15Bull NOK 0.30

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

China Yangtze Power Co · Utilities

Quality score58 · Top 25%
Fair value upside+9.3% · above median

EAM Solar ASA · Utilities

Quality score33 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside−70.9% · bottom 25%

Bottom line

As of Oct 3, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees China Yangtze Power Co as the more attractively valued of the two: China Yangtze Power Co trades at ¥28.54 versus a fair value of ¥31.20 (+9.3%), while EAM Solar ASA trades at NOK 0.70 versus NOK 0.20 (−70.9%).

China Yangtze Power Co has the higher quality score (58/100).

Open China Yangtze Power Co live analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.