Procter & Gamble vs Monster Beverage: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Procter & Gamble (PG) and Monster Beverage (MNST) compare, as of Aug 13, 2026.
As of Aug 13, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Procter & Gamble as the less overvalued of the two: Procter & Gamble trades at $144 versus a fair value of $108 (-25%), while Monster Beverage trades at $45.98 versus $17.91 (-61%).
Procter & Gamble
PG · USD · Consumer Staples
-25%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$144
Fair Value$108
Quality75/100
Monster Beverage
MNST · USD · Consumer Staples
-61%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$45.98
Fair Value$17.91
Quality84/100
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
Procter & GambleMonster Beverage
Valuation
21.5×P/E (TTM)47.1×
3.95×P/S (TTM)10.84×
6.58×P/B11.55×
14.3×EV/EBITDA33.2×
4.13×PEG2.90×
2.9%Dividend yield—
$4.23Dividend per share—
Profitability
19%Net margin23%
23%Operating margin31%
31%Return on equity27%
11%Return on assets18%
Growth
7%Revenue growth (YoY)27%
1.7%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)9.5%
3.5%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)12.5%
Balance & size
0.48×Debt / equity0.05×
$342BMarket cap$95B
healthyGrowth qualityhealthy
Monster Beverage leads: 5 to 8 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
Procter & Gambleof which business quality 71 · market factors 52Monster Beverageof which business quality 82 · market factors 56
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
73
83
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
46
52
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
85
80
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
95
49
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
37
68
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
28
41
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
91
100
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
Procter & Gamble
DCF Models$97.73
Earnings-Based$85.21
Dividend Discount$59.55
Multiples$120
Asset-Based$14.97
Growth DCF$74.21
Economic Profit$68.20
Growth Earnings$112
24 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.
Monster Beverage
DCF Models$57.39
Earnings-Based$41.91
Multiples$34.28
Asset-Based$5.65
Growth DCF$45.42
Economic Profit$27.42
Growth Earnings$56.09
15 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
Procter & Gamble
Bear $70.77Fair Value $108Bull $151
$144 = current price (white tick)
Monster Beverage
Bear $13.70Fair Value $17.91Bull $36.46
$45.98 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Free, no sign-up
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Procter & Gamble · Consumer Staples
Quality score75 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-25% · below median
Monster Beverage · Consumer Staples
Quality score84 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-61% · bottom 25%
Bottom line
As of Aug 13, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Procter & Gamble as the less overvalued of the two: Procter & Gamble trades at $144 versus a fair value of $108 (-25%), while Monster Beverage trades at $45.98 versus $17.91 (-61%).
Monster Beverage has the higher quality score (84/100).
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.