EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Procter & Gamble vs PepsiCo: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Procter & Gamble (PG) and PepsiCo (PEP) compare, as of Aug 16, 2026.

As of Aug 16, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees PepsiCo as the less overvalued of the two: Procter & Gamble trades at $145 versus a fair value of $108 (-25%), while PepsiCo trades at $141 versus $107 (-24%).
Procter & Gamble
PG · USD · Consumer Staples
-25%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$145
Fair Value$108
Quality75/100
PepsiCo
PEP · USD · Consumer Staples
-24%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$141
Fair Value$107
Quality63/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Procter & GamblePepsiCo
Valuation
21.5×P/E (TTM)22.2×
3.95×P/S (TTM)1.97×
6.58×P/B9.23×
14.3×EV/EBITDA11.9×
4.13×PEG1.53×
2.9%Dividend yield4.0%
$4.23Dividend per share$5.69
Profitability
19%Net margin9%
23%Operating margin17%
31%Return on equity44%
11%Return on assets9%
Growth
7%Revenue growth (YoY)9%
1.7%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)2.8%
3.5%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)5.9%
Balance & size
0.48×Debt / equity2.07×
$342BMarket cap$188B
healthyGrowth qualityhealthy

PepsiCo leads: 6 to 8 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Procter & Gambleof which business quality 71 · market factors 52 PepsiCoof which business quality 59 · market factors 50
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
73
69
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
46
32
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
65
52
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
70
49
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
85
77
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
95
93
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
37
32
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
29
31
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
91
85

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Procter & Gamble

DCF Models$97.73
Earnings-Based$85.21
Dividend Discount$59.55
Multiples$120
Asset-Based$14.97
Growth DCF$74.21
Economic Profit$68.20
Growth Earnings$112

24 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.

PepsiCo

DCF Models$81.79
Earnings-Based$50.16
Dividend Discount$93.30
Multiples$115
Asset-Based$10.01
Growth DCF$73.16
Economic Profit$61.14
Growth Earnings$107

24 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Procter & Gamble
Bear $70.77Fair Value $108Bull $151
$145 = current price (white tick)
PepsiCo
Bear $56.05Fair Value $107Bull $158
$141 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Procter & Gamble · Consumer Staples

Quality score75 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-25% · below median

PepsiCo · Consumer Staples

Quality score63 · above median
Fair value upside-24% · below median

Bottom line

As of Aug 16, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees PepsiCo as the less overvalued of the two: Procter & Gamble trades at $145 versus a fair value of $108 (-25%), while PepsiCo trades at $141 versus $107 (-24%).

Procter & Gamble has the higher quality score (75/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.