Philip Morris International vs Monster Beverage: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Philip Morris International (PM) and Monster Beverage (MNST) compare, as of Aug 13, 2026.
As of Aug 13, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Philip Morris International as the less overvalued of the two: Philip Morris International trades at $186 versus a fair value of $104 (-44%), while Monster Beverage trades at $45.98 versus $17.91 (-61%).
Philip Morris International
PM · USD · Consumer Staples
-44%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$186
Fair Value$104
Quality79/100
Monster Beverage
MNST · USD · Consumer Staples
-61%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$45.98
Fair Value$17.91
Quality84/100
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
Philip Morris InternationalMonster Beverage
Valuation
25.4×P/E (TTM)47.1×
7.13×P/S (TTM)10.84×
—P/B11.55×
18.1×EV/EBITDA33.2×
2.52×PEG2.90×
3.2%Dividend yield—
$5.76Dividend per share—
Profitability
27%Net margin23%
36%Operating margin31%
—Return on equity27%
15%Return on assets18%
Growth
9%Revenue growth (YoY)27%
8.6%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)9.5%
7.2%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)12.5%
Balance & size
—Debt / equity0.05×
$296BMarket cap$95B
healthyGrowth qualityhealthy
Philip Morris International leads: 6 to 4 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
Philip Morris Internationalof which business quality 74 · market factors 66Monster Beverageof which business quality 82 · market factors 56
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
76
83
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
63
52
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
85
80
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
86
49
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
50
68
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
70
41
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
80
100
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
Philip Morris International
DCF Models$95.84
Earnings-Based$66.23
Dividend Discount$82.37
Multiples$115
Growth DCF$59.46
Economic Profit$71.82
Growth Earnings$122
22 of 22 models see the stock below the current price.
Monster Beverage
DCF Models$57.39
Earnings-Based$41.91
Multiples$34.28
Asset-Based$5.65
Growth DCF$45.42
Economic Profit$27.42
Growth Earnings$56.09
15 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
Philip Morris International
Bear $62.46Fair Value $104Bull $148
$186 = current price (white tick)
Monster Beverage
Bear $13.70Fair Value $17.91Bull $36.46
$45.98 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Free, no sign-up
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Philip Morris International · Consumer Staples
Quality score79 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-44% · bottom 25%
Monster Beverage · Consumer Staples
Quality score84 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-61% · bottom 25%
Bottom line
As of Aug 13, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Philip Morris International as the less overvalued of the two: Philip Morris International trades at $186 versus a fair value of $104 (-44%), while Monster Beverage trades at $45.98 versus $17.91 (-61%).
Monster Beverage has the higher quality score (84/100).
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
