Fair Value Calculator Fair Value Calculator
EN DE

1615 (1615) Fair Value & Analysis

Industrials · Market cap HK$234M

1 1615 1615 · HK
PriceHK$0.3800
Fair ValueHK$0.0700
Upside-81.6%
Quality75/100
Watch 1615 for free — get notified when fair value or trend changes. Watch for free
Evidence: Medium Range HK$0.0500 – HK$0.0900

Fair value as of: Jul 2, 2026

From 18 valuation models · updated today

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

HK$0.3897 HK$0.2017 Fair Value HK$0.0700 Jun 2025 Jul 2026

12‑month range HK$0.2017 – HK$0.3897 · fair‑value band HK$0.0500 – HK$0.0900 · the HK$0.3800 price screens above the HK$0.0700 fair value. As of Jul 2, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

1615 (1615) currently trades at HK$0.3800, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$0.0700 — implying the stock looks roughly 81.6% overvalued today. We read business quality at 75/100 (high quality), in the Industrials sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: medium).

Over the trailing twelve months, 1615 generated revenue of HK$294M at a net margin of 0.7%. Revenue declined 17.0% year over year. It earns a return on equity of 1.1%. The balance sheet holds a net cash position of HK$57.0M. Fundamentals as of Jul 2, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$294M
Revenue growth (YoY) -17.0%
Net margin 0.7%
Return on equity 1.1%
Free cash flow HK$30.9M FY2025
EPS growth (YoY) -71.6%
More key figures
Net cash HK$57.0M FY2025

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 2, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2021 – FY2025 · reported fiscal years

1615 reported revenue of HK$273M in FY2025 versus HK$353M in FY2021, a compound −6.2%/yr. Reported net income was HK$1.9M in FY2025.

Revenue −6.2%/yr
FY21 HK$353M
FY22 HK$155M
FY23 HK$141M
FY24 HK$182M
FY25 HK$273M
Net income
FY21 −HK$6.6M
FY22 HK$15.4M
FY23 −HK$10.3M
FY24 HK$9.4M
FY25 HK$1.9M

Is 1615 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Engineering & Construction stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 2, 2026).

Stock Price Fair Value vs Fair Value
Larsen & Toubro Limited LTOD $0.4415 $0.5700 +29%
Samsung C&T Corporation 028260 520,000 KRW 268,469 KRW -48%
China State Construction Engineering Corporation 601668 ¥4.65 ¥17.35 +273%
TopBuild Corp BLD 7,547 MXN 324.01 MXN -96%
000720 000720 115,100 KRW 64,227 KRW -44%
United Integrated Services Co 2404 1,195 TWD 1,681 TWD +41%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Industrials stocks →

All undervalued stocks TechnologyFinancial ServicesHealthcareConsumer CyclicalConsumer DefensiveCommunication ServicesIndustrialsEnergyBasic MaterialsReal EstateUtilities Deeply Undervalued StocksUndervalued Blue-Chip StocksUndervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 1615 (1615) undervalued?
As of Jul 2, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$0.0700 versus a price of HK$0.3800 — about −82% (overvalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of 1615?
Our model-based fair value for 1615 is HK$0.0700 (as of Jul 2, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$0.3800.
What is the quality score of 1615?
1615 has a Quality Score of 75/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.
What is the revenue of 1615 (1615)?
1615 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$294M (latest available figure, as of Jul 2, 2026).
What is the net profit margin of 1615?
The net profit margin of 1615 is about 0.7%, meaning it keeps roughly 0.7% of revenue as net income. Based on the latest reported figures.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.