1722 (1722) Fair Value & Analysis

Industrials · Market cap HK$110M

1 1722 1722 · HK

PriceHK$0.0930

Fair ValueHK$0.1181

Upside+27.0%

Quality53/100

Watch 1722 for free — get notified when fair value or trend changes. Watch for free

Evidence: Low Range HK$0.0716 – HK$0.1646

Fair value as of: Jul 2, 2026

From 2 valuation models · updated today

Share price +13.4% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

12‑month range HK$0.0470 – HK$0.1400 · fair‑value band HK$0.0716 – HK$0.1646 · the HK$0.0930 price screens below the HK$0.1181 fair value. As of Jul 2, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

1722 (1722) currently trades at HK$0.0930, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$0.1181 — implying the stock looks roughly 27.0% undervalued today. We read business quality at 53/100 (solid quality), in the Industrials sector. Bull case: trading below our estimate, it may offer upside if the fundamentals hold. Bear case: a low price can be a value trap when quality is weak or the data is thin (evidence: low) — always confirm before acting.

Over the trailing twelve months, 1722 generated revenue of HK$686M at a net margin of -3.1%. Revenue declined 14.4% year over year. It earns a return on equity of -13.1%. Net debt stands at HK$91.2M. Fundamentals as of Jul 2, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$686M

Revenue growth (YoY) -14.4%

Net margin -3.1%

Return on equity -13.1%

Free cash flow −HK$3.7M FY2025

EPS growth (YoY) +124%

More key figures

Net debt HK$91.2M FY2025

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 2, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2021 – FY2025 · reported fiscal years

1722 reported revenue of HK$637M in FY2025 versus HK$959M in FY2021, a compound −9.7%/yr. Reported net income was −HK$19.8M in FY2025.

Revenue −9.7%/yr

FY21 HK$959M

FY22 HK$599M

FY23 HK$583M

FY24 HK$675M

FY25 HK$637M

Net income

FY21 −HK$20.8M

FY22 −HK$11.6M

FY23 −HK$34.1M

FY24 −HK$17.7M

FY25 −HK$19.8M

Is 1722 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Engineering & Construction stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 2, 2026).

Stock	Price	Fair Value	vs Fair Value
Larsen & Toubro Limited LTOD	$0.4110	$0.0100	-98%
Samsung C&T Corporation 028260	407,500 KRW	236,704 KRW	-42%
China State Construction Engineering Corporation 601668	¥4.74	¥15.02	+217%
TopBuild Corp BLD	7,547 MXN	3,472 MXN	-54%
000720 000720	130,300 KRW	55,602 KRW	-57%
United Integrated Services Co 2404	1,205 TWD	1,891 TWD	+57%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Industrials stocks →

All undervalued stocks Technology Financial Services Healthcare Consumer Cyclical Consumer Defensive Communication Services Industrials Energy Basic Materials Real Estate Utilities Deeply Undervalued Stocks Undervalued Blue-Chip Stocks Undervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 1722 (1722) undervalued?

As of Jul 2, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$0.1181 versus a price of HK$0.0930 — about +27% (undervalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.

What is the fair value of 1722?

Our model-based fair value for 1722 is HK$0.1181 (as of Jul 2, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$0.0930.

What is the quality score of 1722?

1722 has a Quality Score of 53/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

What is the revenue of 1722 (1722)?

1722 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$686M (latest available figure, as of Jul 2, 2026).

What is the net profit margin of 1722?

The net profit margin of 1722 is about -3.1%, meaning it is currently running at a net loss. Based on the latest reported figures.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.