Fairvalue-Calculator Fairvalue-Calculator
EN DE

NanoSilikhan Advanced Materials Co (286750) Fair Value & Analysis

Technology · KR · Market cap 48.3B KRW

Price1,627 KRW
Fair Value2,568 KRW
Upside+57.9%
Quality95/100
Evidence: Low Range 1,926 KRW – 3,211 KRW

Fair value as of: Jun 24, 2026

✦ Find undervalued quality stocks — 34,000+ analysed Find stocks →

Analysis

NanoSilikhan Advanced Materials Co (286750) currently trades at 1,627 KRW, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is 2,568 KRW — implying the stock looks roughly 57.9% undervalued today. We read business quality at 95/100 (high quality), in the Technology sector. Bull case: trading below our estimate, it may offer upside if the fundamentals hold. Bear case: a low price can be a value trap when quality is weak or the data is thin (evidence: low) — always confirm before acting.

About the company

NanoSilikhan Advanced Materials Co., Ltd. develops, manufactures, and sells nano materials and applications for security, biotechnology, functionality, and display applications. NanoSilikhan Advanced Materials Co., Ltd. was formerly known as NANOBRICK Co., Ltd. and changed its name to NanoSilikhan Advanced Materials Co., Ltd. in March 2025. The company was incorporated in 2007 and is based in Pyeongtaek-si, South Korea.

Open the full interactive analysis →

Similar stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is NanoSilikhan Advanced Materials Co (286750) undervalued?
As of Jun 24, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of 2,568 KRW versus a price of 1,627 KRW — about +58% (undervalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of 286750?
Our 21-model fair value for NanoSilikhan Advanced Materials Co is 2,568 KRW (as of Jun 24, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is 1,627 KRW.
What is the quality score of 286750?
NanoSilikhan Advanced Materials Co has a Quality Score of 95/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.