3321 (3321) Fair Value & Analysis

Industrials · Market cap HK$100M

3 3321 3321 · HK

PriceHK$1.31

Fair ValueHK$1.20

Upside-8.4%

Quality63/100

Watch 3321 for free — get notified when fair value or trend changes. Watch for free

Evidence: Low Range HK$1.07 – HK$1.33

Fair value as of: Jul 2, 2026

From 6 valuation models · updated today

Share price −17.6% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

12‑month range HK$0.3800 – HK$2.07 · fair‑value band HK$1.07 – HK$1.33 · the HK$1.31 price screens above the HK$1.20 fair value. As of Jul 2, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

3321 (3321) currently trades at HK$1.31, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$1.20 — implying the stock looks roughly 8.4% overvalued today. We read business quality at 63/100 (solid quality), in the Industrials sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: low).

Trailing-twelve-month revenue stands at HK$3.8M. Net debt stands at HK$63.4M. Fundamentals as of Jul 2, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$3.8M

Revenue growth (YoY) +313%

Return on equity -167%

Free cash flow HK$13.2M FY2025

EPS (TTM) HK$-0.1000

EPS growth (YoY) -9.9%

More key figures

Net debt HK$63.4M FY2025

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 2, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2021 – FY2025 · reported fiscal years

3321 reported revenue of HK$12.2M in FY2025 versus HK$292M in FY2021, a compound −54.8%/yr. Reported net income was −HK$72.6M in FY2025.

Revenue −54.8%/yr

FY21 HK$292M

FY22 HK$54.6M

FY23 HK$106M

FY24 HK$8.8M

FY25 HK$12.2M

Net income

FY21 −HK$29.1M

FY22 −HK$70.6M

FY23 −HK$27.8M

FY24 −HK$48.9M

FY25 −HK$72.6M

Is 3321 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Engineering & Construction stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 2, 2026).

Stock	Price	Fair Value	vs Fair Value
Larsen & Toubro Limited LTOD	$0.4415	$0.5700	+29%
Samsung C&T Corporation 028260	520,000 KRW	268,469 KRW	-48%
China State Construction Engineering Corporation 601668	¥4.65	¥17.35	+273%
TopBuild Corp BLD	7,547 MXN	4,541 MXN	-40%
000720 000720	127,800 KRW	55,602 KRW	-56%
United Integrated Services Co 2404	1,195 TWD	1,681 TWD	+41%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Industrials stocks →

All undervalued stocks Technology Financial Services Healthcare Consumer Cyclical Consumer Defensive Communication Services Industrials Energy Basic Materials Real Estate Utilities Deeply Undervalued Stocks Undervalued Blue-Chip Stocks Undervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 3321 (3321) undervalued?

As of Jul 2, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$1.20 versus a price of HK$1.31 — about −8% (overvalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.

What is the fair value of 3321?

Our model-based fair value for 3321 is HK$1.20 (as of Jul 2, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$1.31.

What is the quality score of 3321?

3321 has a Quality Score of 63/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

What is the revenue of 3321 (3321)?

3321 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$3.8M (latest available figure, as of Jul 2, 2026).

What is the net profit margin of 3321?

The net profit margin of 3321 is about 0.0%, meaning it keeps roughly 0.0% of revenue as net income. Based on the latest reported figures.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.