Fairvalue-Calculator Fairvalue-Calculator
EN DE

LBC (LBC) Fair Value & Analysis

Industrials · PH · Market cap 21.4B PHP

Price6.00 PHP
Fair Value3.01 PHP
Upside-49.8%
Quality92/100
Evidence: Medium Range 2.28 PHP – 3.74 PHP

Fair value as of: Jun 24, 2026

✦ Find undervalued quality stocks — 34,000+ analysed Find stocks →

Analysis

LBC (LBC) currently trades at 6.00 PHP, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is 3.01 PHP — implying the stock looks roughly 49.8% overvalued today. We read business quality at 92/100 (high quality), in the Industrials sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: medium).

Open the full interactive analysis →

Similar stocks

PT Trada Alam Minera Tbk, (TRAM) +223% LG Energy Solution, Ltd (373220) -86% Samsung C&T Corporation (028260) -55% HD Hyundai Heavy Industries Co (329180) -50% Hanwha Aerospace Co (012450) +28% WEG S.A (WEGE3) -46%

Frequently asked questions

Is LBC (LBC) undervalued?
As of Jun 24, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of 3.01 PHP versus a price of 6.00 PHP — about −50% (overvalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of LBC?
Our 21-model fair value for LBC is 3.01 PHP (as of Jun 24, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is 6.00 PHP.
What is the quality score of LBC?
LBC has a Quality Score of 92/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.