EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Guangdong Ganhua Science & Industry Co vs 3M: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Guangdong Ganhua Science & Industry Co (000576) and 3M (MMM) compare, as of Sep 25, 2026.

As of Sep 25, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees 3M as the less overvalued of the two: Guangdong Ganhua Science & Industry Co trades at ¥8.27 versus a fair value of ¥3.05 (-63%), while 3M trades at $170 versus $71.86 (-58%).
Guangdong Ganhua Science & Industry Co
000576.SHE · CNY · Consumer Staples
-63%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price¥8.27
Fair Value¥3.05
Quality62/100
3M
MMM · USD · Industrials
-58%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$170
Fair Value$71.86
Quality62/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green is the better side of a row, red the weaker one (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper). Grey rows are for reference only and are not scored.

betterweakerfor reference, not scored

Guangdong Ganhua Science & Industry Co3M
Valuation
52.6×P/E (TTM)32.9×
n/aP/E ex one-offs (FY2025)47.2×
6.35×P/S (TTM)3.67×
2.23×P/B19.52× · book value is mostly goodwill
68.9×EV/EBITDA15.6×
0.71×PEG1.67×
−63.1%Fair value upside−57.8%
0.1%Dividend yield1.7%
n/aDividend per share$2.97
Profitability
3%Operating margin23%
0.07×EBIT margin trend (5Y)0.85×
5%Return on equity71%
1%Return on assets8%
Growth
76%Revenue growth (YoY)1%
4.3%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)n/a
-0.4%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)n/a
−4.5%Value creation/yr−11.5%
Balance & size
66.6×Interest coverage (EBIT/interest)6.3×
0.01×Debt / equity2.33×
$549MMarket cap$92B
weakGrowth qualitymixed
The P/E excluding one-off items is only shown where the special items are documented in the accounts (our own raw data or SEC filings). If one side lacks it, the reported P/E stays scored.
Valuation multiples (P/E, P/S, P/B, EV/EBITDA) are shown but not scored here: the two companies sit in different sectors, and multiples only compare fairly between similar business models. PEG stays scored, as it relates the P/E to growth.

3M leads: 4 to 6 metric wins.

n/a = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Guangdong Ganhua Science & Industry Coof which business quality 62 · market factors 41 3Mof which business quality 56 · market factors 59
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
30
62
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
65
32
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
61
33
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
85
37
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
91
97
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
64
65
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
36
55
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
22
58
Net IssuanceShare count: buybacks or dilution?
52
100

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyGuangdong Ganhua Science & Industry CoPrice ¥8.273MPrice $170
DCF Models-66%below the price¥2.78-44%below the price$95.13
Earnings-Based-74%below the price¥2.15-56%below the price$75.06
Dividend Discountn/a-84%below the price$27.44
Multiples-60%below the price¥3.30-50%below the price$85.72
Asset-Based-69%below the price¥2.53-96%below the price$6.04
Growth DCF-74%below the price¥2.14-69%below the price$53.39
Economic Profit-68%below the price¥2.63-53%below the price$80.57
Minimum-74%below the price¥2.14-96%below the price$6.04
Maximum-60%below the price¥3.30-44%below the price$95.13
Median-69%below the price¥2.58-56%below the price$75.06
Geometric mean-69%below the price¥2.56-73%below the price$46.01

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Guangdong Ganhua Science & Industry Co: 10 of 10 models see the stock below the current price.

3M: 12 of 12 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.

Guangdong Ganhua Science & Industry Co
Price ¥8.27
Fair Value ¥3.05
Bear ¥2.32Bull ¥3.97
3M
Price $170
Fair Value $71.86
Bear $43.30Bull $102

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Guangdong Ganhua Science & Industry Co · Consumer Staples

Quality score62 · above median
Fair value upside-63% · bottom 25%

3M · Industrials

Quality score62 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-58% · bottom 25%

Bottom line

As of Sep 25, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees 3M as the less overvalued of the two: Guangdong Ganhua Science & Industry Co trades at ¥8.27 versus a fair value of ¥3.05 (-63%), while 3M trades at $170 versus $71.86 (-58%).

Guangdong Ganhua Science & Industry Co has the higher quality score (62/100).

Open 3M live analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.