EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Asia Potash International Investment Guangzhou Co vs Corteva: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Asia Potash International Investment Guangzhou Co (000893) and Corteva (CTVA) compare, as of Aug 10, 2026.

As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Asia Potash International Investment Guangzhou Co as the less overvalued of the two: Asia Potash International Investment Guangzhou Co trades at ¥48.23 versus a fair value of ¥38.01 (-21%), while Corteva trades at $76.83 versus $27.81 (-64%).
Asia Potash International Investment Guangzhou Co
000893.SHE · CNY · Consumer Staples
-21%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price¥48.23
Fair Value¥38.01
Quality59/100
Corteva
CTVA · USD · Materials
-64%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$76.83
Fair Value$27.81
Quality71/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Asia Potash International Investment Guangzhou CoCorteva
Valuation
24.4×P/E (TTM)46.3×
8.01×P/S (TTM)3.20×
3.36×P/B2.37×
14.4×EV/EBITDA13.2×
2.08×PEG1.44×
0.2%Dividend yield0.9%
¥0.11Dividend per share$0.72
Profitability
33%Net margin7%
42%Operating margin24%
14%Return on equity5%
8%Return on assets4%
Growth
23%Revenue growth (YoY)11%
15.4%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)-0.1%
71.1%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)4.1%
Balance & size
0.13×Debt / equity0.07×
$7BMarket cap$57B
expensiveGrowth qualityhealthy

Asia Potash International Investment Guangzhou Co leads: 8 to 6 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Asia Potash International Investment Guangzhou Coof which business quality 58 · market factors 60 Cortevaof which business quality 69 · market factors 58
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
49
30
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
73
48
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
50
80
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
83
74
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
24
97
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
62
84
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
52
45
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
72
51
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
58
100

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Asia Potash International Investment Guangzhou Co

DCF Models¥32.85
Earnings-Based¥40.60
Multiples¥34.39
Asset-Based¥9.69
Growth DCF¥12.74
Economic Profit¥26.89
Growth Earnings¥53.69

19 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.

Corteva

DCF Models$50.58
Earnings-Based$30.99
Dividend Discount$9.27
Multiples$35.54
Asset-Based$24.19
Growth DCF$57.96
Economic Profit$34.06
Growth Earnings$21.85

24 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Asia Potash International Investment Guangzhou Co
Bear ¥22.74Fair Value ¥38.01Bull ¥48.13
¥48.23 = current price (white tick)
Corteva
Bear $20.86Fair Value $27.81Bull $34.76
$76.83 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Asia Potash International Investment Guangzhou Co · Consumer Staples

Quality score59 · above median
Fair value upside-21% · below median

Corteva · Materials

Quality score71 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-64% · bottom 25%

Bottom line

As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Asia Potash International Investment Guangzhou Co as the less overvalued of the two: Asia Potash International Investment Guangzhou Co trades at ¥48.23 versus a fair value of ¥38.01 (-21%), while Corteva trades at $76.83 versus $27.81 (-64%).

Corteva has the higher quality score (71/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.