EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Cho Bi vs Corteva: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Cho Bi (001550) and Corteva (CTVA) compare, as of Aug 11, 2026.

As of Aug 11, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Cho Bi as the less overvalued of the two: Cho Bi trades at KRW 10,060 versus a fair value of KRW 6,460 (-36%), while Corteva trades at $76.83 versus $27.81 (-64%).
Cho Bi
001550.KO · KRW · Materials
-36%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceKRW 10,060
Fair ValueKRW 6,460
Quality52/100
Corteva
CTVA · USD · Materials
-64%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$76.83
Fair Value$27.81
Quality71/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Cho BiCorteva
Valuation
P/E (TTM)46.3×
P/S (TTM)3.20×
P/B2.37×
EV/EBITDA13.2×
PEG1.44×
Dividend yield0.9%
Dividend per share$0.72
Profitability
0%Net margin7%
-19%Operating margin24%
0%Return on equity5%
1%Return on assets4%
Growth
-10%Revenue growth (YoY)11%
-12.4%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)-0.1%
6.3%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)4.1%
Balance & size
0.02×Debt / equity0.07×
$38MMarket cap$57B
mixedGrowth qualityhealthy

Corteva leads: 2 to 6 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Cho Biof which business quality 50 · market factors 23 Cortevaof which business quality 69 · market factors 58
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
32
30
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
50
48
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
37
80
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
35
74
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
99
97
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
56
84
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
13
45
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
3
51
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
82
100

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Cho Bi

DCF ModelsKRW 7,066
Earnings-BasedKRW 6,294
MultiplesKRW 8,358
Asset-BasedKRW 7,058
Growth DCFKRW 6,906
Economic ProfitKRW 7,836
Growth EarningsKRW 5,385

20 of 23 models see the stock below the current price.

Corteva

DCF Models$50.58
Earnings-Based$30.99
Dividend Discount$9.27
Multiples$35.54
Asset-Based$24.19
Growth DCF$57.96
Economic Profit$34.06
Growth Earnings$21.85

24 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Cho Bi
Bear KRW 4,845Fair Value KRW 6,460Bull KRW 8,075
KRW 10,060 = current price (white tick)
Corteva
Bear $20.86Fair Value $27.81Bull $34.76
$76.83 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Cho Bi · Materials

Quality score52 · above median
Fair value upside-36% · below median

Corteva · Materials

Quality score71 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-64% · bottom 25%

Bottom line

As of Aug 11, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Cho Bi as the less overvalued of the two: Cho Bi trades at KRW 10,060 versus a fair value of KRW 6,460 (-36%), while Corteva trades at $76.83 versus $27.81 (-64%).

Corteva has the higher quality score (71/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.