EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

FreeMs vs Amphenol: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how FreeMs (053160) and Amphenol (APH) compare, as of Sep 25, 2026.

As of Sep 25, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Amphenol as the more attractively valued of the two: FreeMs trades at KRW 9,340 versus a fair value of KRW 4,792 (-49%), while Amphenol trades at $82.19 versus $90.41 (+10%).
FreeMs
053160.KQ · KRW · Industrials
-49%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceKRW 9,340
Fair ValueKRW 4,792
Quality64/100
Amphenol
APH · USD · Information Technology
+10%
upside to fair value
undervalued
Price$82.19
Fair Value$90.41
Quality68/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green is the better side of a row, red the weaker one (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper). Grey rows are for reference only and are not scored.

betterweakerfor reference, not scored

FreeMsAmphenol
Valuation
n/aP/E (TTM)23.6×
n/aP/S (TTM)7.18×
n/aP/B13.87×
n/aEV/EBITDA23.2×
n/aPEG1.29×
−48.7%Fair value upside+10.0%
1.4%Dividend yield1.0%
KRW 130Dividend per share$0.83
Profitability
-1%Operating margin27%
n/aEBIT margin trend (5Y)1.35×
-1%Return on equity37%
0%Return on assets13%
Growth
-2%Revenue growth (YoY)58%
-7.9%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)22.3%
4.7%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)21.8%
+11.8%Value creation/yr+24.5%
Balance & size
12.2×Interest coverage (EBIT/interest)16.2×
0.00×Debt / equity1.09×
$37MMarket cap$186B
weakGrowth qualityhealthy
Valuation multiples (P/E, P/S, P/B, EV/EBITDA) are shown but not scored here: the two companies sit in different sectors, and multiples only compare fairly between similar business models. PEG stays scored, as it relates the P/E to growth.

Amphenol leads: 2 to 8 metric wins.

n/a = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

FreeMsof which business quality 65 · market factors 50 Amphenolof which business quality 67 · market factors 58
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
18
67
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
83
70
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
58
72
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
89
78
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
74
29
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
34
37
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
55
63
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
59
75
Net IssuanceShare count: buybacks or dilution?
83
71

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyFreeMsPrice KRW 9,340AmphenolPrice $82.19
DCF Models-48%below the priceKRW 4,884+22%above the price$100
Earnings-Based-73%below the priceKRW 2,506-42%below the price$47.38
Dividend Discountn/a-86%below the price$11.48
Multiples-60%below the priceKRW 3,759-4%close to the price$78.76
Asset-Based0%close to the priceKRW 9,365-91%below the price$7.30
Growth DCF-43%below the priceKRW 5,367+3%close to the price$84.28
Economic Profit-34%below the priceKRW 6,161-45%below the price$45.51
Growth Earnings-70%below the priceKRW 2,802+2%close to the price$83.60
Minimum-73%below the priceKRW 2,506-91%below the price$7.30
Maximum0%close to the priceKRW 9,365+22%above the price$100
Median-48%below the priceKRW 4,884-23%below the price$63.07
Geometric mean-51%below the priceKRW 4,543-49%below the price$42.19

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

FreeMs: 21 of 22 models see the stock below the current price.

Amphenol: 14 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.

FreeMs
Price KRW 9,340
Fair Value KRW 4,792
Bear KRW 4,517Bull KRW 5,061
Amphenol
Price $82.19
Fair Value $90.41
Bear $56.95Bull $144

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

FreeMs · Industrials

Quality score64 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-49% · below median

Amphenol · Information Technology

Quality score68 · Top 25%
Fair value upside+10% · above median

Bottom line

As of Sep 25, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Amphenol as the more attractively valued of the two: FreeMs trades at KRW 9,340 versus a fair value of KRW 4,792 (-49%), while Amphenol trades at $82.19 versus $90.41 (+10%).

Amphenol has the higher quality score (68/100).

Open Amphenol live analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.