APlus Group Holdings vs Cintas: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how APlus Group Holdings (1841) and Cintas (CTAS) compare, as of Aug 17, 2026.
As of Aug 17, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees APlus Group Holdings as the less overvalued of the two: APlus Group Holdings trades at HK$0.38 versus a fair value of HK$0.27 (-28%), while Cintas trades at $200 versus $95.19 (-52%).
APlus Group Holdings
1841.HK · HKD · Industrials
-28%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceHK$0.38
Fair ValueHK$0.27
Quality57/100
Cintas
CTAS · USD · Industrials
-52%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$200
Fair Value$95.19
Quality78/100
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
APlus Group HoldingsCintas
Valuation
—P/E (TTM)42.0×
0.13×P/S (TTM)7.33×
0.11×P/B16.06×
—EV/EBITDA27.0×
—PEG3.06×
—Dividend yield1.0%
—Dividend per share$1.74
Profitability
-4%Net margin18%
13%Operating margin24%
-4%Return on equity41%
-2%Return on assets16%
Growth
-3%Revenue growth (YoY)9%
-8.5%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)8.5%
-7.8%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)9.6%
Balance & size
—Debt / equity0.47×
$12MMarket cap$83B
weakGrowth qualityhealthy
Cintas leads: 2 to 7 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
APlus Group Holdingsof which business quality 57 · market factors 85Cintasof which business quality 74 · market factors 54
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
29
91
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
5
53
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
100
71
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
50
74
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
100
47
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
100
41
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
82
90
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
APlus Group Holdings
MultiplesHK$0.27
Asset-BasedHK$0.18
2 of 2 models see the stock below the current price.
Cintas
DCF Models$96.89
Earnings-Based$48.67
Dividend Discount$30.85
Multiples$76.91
Asset-Based$8.61
Growth DCF$74.33
Economic Profit$58.94
Growth Earnings$81.35
26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
APlus Group Holdings
Bear HK$0.25Fair Value HK$0.27Bull HK$0.29
HK$0.38 = current price (white tick)
Cintas
Bear $55.52Fair Value $95.19Bull $121
$200 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Free, no sign-up
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
APlus Group Holdings · Industrials
Quality score57 · above median
Fair value upside-28% · below median
Cintas · Industrials
Quality score78 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-52% · below median
Bottom line
As of Aug 17, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees APlus Group Holdings as the less overvalued of the two: APlus Group Holdings trades at HK$0.38 versus a fair value of HK$0.27 (-28%), while Cintas trades at $200 versus $95.19 (-52%).
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
