EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Sands China Ltd vs Las Vegas Sands: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Sands China Ltd (SCHYY) and Las Vegas Sands (LVS) compare, as of Aug 8, 2026.

As of Aug 8, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Sands China Ltd as the more attractively valued of the two: Sands China Ltd trades at $18.39 versus a fair value of $21.78 (+18%), while Las Vegas Sands trades at $46.11 versus $52.27 (+13%).
Sands China Ltd
SCHYY · USD · Consumer Discretionary
+18%
upside to fair value
undervalued
Price$18.39
Fair Value$21.78
Quality54/100
Las Vegas Sands
LVS · USD · Consumer Discretionary
+13%
upside to fair value
undervalued
Price$46.11
Fair Value$52.27
Quality59/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Sands China LtdLas Vegas Sands
Valuation
16.0×P/E (TTM)17.0×
1.95×P/S (TTM)2.16×
10.34×P/B18.66×
9.3×EV/EBITDA8.4×
0.65×PEG0.93×
7.2%Dividend yield2.4%
$0.10Dividend per share$1.10
Profitability
12%Net margin13%
18%Operating margin25%
74%Return on equity90%
7%Return on assets10%
Growth
12%Revenue growth (YoY)25%
35.1%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)46.9%
-4.3%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)34.7%
Balance & size
4.33×Debt / equity9.22×
$14BMarket cap$30B
mixedGrowth qualityhealthy

Las Vegas Sands leads: 6 to 8 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Sands China Ltdof which business quality 59 · market factors 36 Las Vegas Sandsof which business quality 64 · market factors 35
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
61
60
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
28
58
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
91
68
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
21
29
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
73
86
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
81
65
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
20
26
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
11
15
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
82
100

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Sands China Ltd

DCF Models$26.09
Earnings-Based$12.33
Dividend Discount$11.26
Multiples$18.13
Asset-Based$1.16
Growth DCF$26.70
Economic Profit$12.87
Growth Earnings$19.71

13 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Las Vegas Sands

DCF Models$47.96
Earnings-Based$31.58
Dividend Discount$22.12
Multiples$45.43
Asset-Based$1.61
Growth DCF$45.84
Economic Profit$30.87
Growth Earnings$47.43

14 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Sands China Ltd
Bear $14.61Fair Value $21.78Bull $28.95
$18.39 = current price (white tick)
Las Vegas Sands
Bear $22.10Fair Value $52.27Bull $67.52
$46.11 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Sands China Ltd · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score54 · above median
Fair value upside+18% · above median

Las Vegas Sands · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score59 · Top 25%
Fair value upside+13% · above median

Bottom line

As of Aug 8, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Sands China Ltd as the more attractively valued of the two: Sands China Ltd trades at $18.39 versus a fair value of $21.78 (+18%), while Las Vegas Sands trades at $46.11 versus $52.27 (+13%).

Las Vegas Sands has the higher quality score (59/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.