EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

XiaMen HongXin Electron-tech Co vs Amphenol: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how XiaMen HongXin Electron-tech Co (300657) and Amphenol (APH) compare, as of Sep 28, 2026.

As of Sep 28, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Amphenol as the less overvalued of the two: XiaMen HongXin Electron-tech Co trades at ¥36.04 versus a fair value of ¥8.55 (−76.3%), while Amphenol trades at $84.09 versus $71.77 (−14.6%).
XiaMen HongXin Electron-tech Co
300657.SHE · CNY · Information Technology
−76.3%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price¥36.04
Fair Value¥8.55
Quality48/100
Amphenol
APH · USD · Information Technology
−14.6%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$84.09
Fair Value$71.77
Quality56/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green is the better side of a row, red the weaker one (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper). Grey rows are for reference only and are not scored.

betterweakerfor reference, not scored

XiaMen HongXin Electron-tech CoAmphenol
Valuation
94.8×P/E (TTM)41.6×
n/aForward P/E (FY2027)25.6×
3.10×P/S (TTM)7.48×
17.08×P/B16.17×
24.7×EV/EBITDA23.3×
n/aPEG0.93×
−76.3%Fair value upside−14.6%
0.2%Dividend yield0.5%
n/aDividend per share$0.46
Profitability
6.9%Operating margin29.8%
1.83×EBIT margin trend (5Y)1.35×
14.8%Return on equity38.1%
3.6%Return on assets14.5%
Growth
1.9%Revenue growth (YoY)55.0%
37.8%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)22.3%
22.6%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)21.8%
−3.0%Value creation/yr+24.0%
Balance & size
3.8×Interest coverage (EBIT/interest)16.2×
0.46×Debt / equity1.09×
$3BMarket cap$217B
expensiveGrowth qualityhealthy
Forward P/E: price divided by the analyst consensus for the first fiscal year that has not started yet. The current year carries special items from quarters already reported. Amphenol: FY 2026 earnings estimate probably distorted by a special item known to analysts (2.67 is not between the FY 2025 actual of 3.34 and the FY 2027 estimate of 3.28).

Amphenol leads: 5 to 10 metric wins.

n/a = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

XiaMen HongXin Electron-tech Coof which business quality 45 · market factors 36 Amphenolof which business quality 57 · market factors 63
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
36
67
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
80
70
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
5
72
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
48
78
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
60
29
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
45
37
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
31
69
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
36
81
Net IssuanceShare count: buybacks or dilution?
66
0

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyXiaMen HongXin Electron-tech CoPrice ¥36.04AmphenolPrice $84.09
DCF Models−64.6%below the price¥12.76−36.8%below the price$53.19
Earnings-Based−74.2%below the price¥9.29−71.9%below the price$23.64
Dividend Discountn/a−92.6%below the price$6.22
Multiples−67.1%below the price¥11.86−53.3%below the price$39.29
Asset-Based−94.9%below the price¥1.85−95.7%below the price$3.64
Growth DCFn/a−46.9%below the price$44.66
Economic Profit−74.8%below the price¥9.09−73.2%below the price$22.50
Growth Earnings−69.1%below the price¥11.12−50.4%below the price$41.71
Minimum−94.9%below the price¥1.85−95.7%below the price$3.64
Maximum−64.6%below the price¥12.76−36.8%below the price$53.19
Median−71.7%below the price¥10.21−62.6%below the price$31.47
Geometric mean−77.8%below the price¥8.00−74.4%below the price$21.57

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

XiaMen HongXin Electron-tech Co: 14 of 15 models see the stock below the current price.

Amphenol: 26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.

XiaMen HongXin Electron-tech Co
Price ¥36.04
Fair Value ¥8.55
Bear ¥6.41Bull ¥10.69
Amphenol
Price $84.09
Fair Value $71.77
Bear $46.41Bull $103

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

XiaMen HongXin Electron-tech Co · Information Technology

Quality score48 · below median
Fair value upside−76.3% · bottom 25%

Amphenol · Information Technology

Quality score56 · above median
Fair value upside−14.6% · above median

Bottom line

As of Sep 28, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Amphenol as the less overvalued of the two: XiaMen HongXin Electron-tech Co trades at ¥36.04 versus a fair value of ¥8.55 (−76.3%), while Amphenol trades at $84.09 versus $71.77 (−14.6%).

Amphenol has the higher quality score (56/100).

Open Amphenol live analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.