EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Shenzhen L&A Design Holding vs Quanta Services: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Shenzhen L&A Design Holding (300949) and Quanta Services (PWR) compare, as of Sep 14, 2026.

As of Sep 14, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Quanta Services as the less overvalued of the two: Shenzhen L&A Design Holding trades at ¥22.60 versus a fair value of ¥5.46 (-76%), while Quanta Services trades at $651 versus $163 (-75%).
Shenzhen L&A Design Holding
300949.SHE · CNY · Industrials
-76%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price¥22.60
Fair Value¥5.46
Quality61/100
Quanta Services
PWR · USD · Industrials
-75%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$651
Fair Value$163
Quality50/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Shenzhen L&A Design HoldingQuanta Services
Valuation
—P/E (TTM)91.8×
0.68×P/S (TTM)3.33×
0.51×P/B11.22×
12.5×EV/EBITDA39.5×
—PEG1.84×
−75.8%Fair value upside−74.9%
0.2%Dividend yield0.1%
—Dividend per share$0.42
Profitability
6%Operating margin4%
—EBIT margin trend (5Y)1.02×
-20%Return on equity14%
-0%Return on assets5%
Growth
-11%Revenue growth (YoY)26%
-3.3%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)18.4%
-2.4%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)20.4%
—Value creation/yr+16.8%
Balance & size
—Interest coverage (EBIT/interest)6.3×
—Debt / equity0.59×
$291MMarket cap$100B
weakGrowth qualityhealthy

Even match: 5 to 5 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Shenzhen L&A Design Holdingof which business quality 59 · market factors 24 Quanta Servicesof which business quality 52 · market factors 63
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
9
45
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
60
44
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
51
59
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
81
55
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
100
36
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
50
41
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
17
67
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
8
84
Net IssuanceShare count: buybacks or dilution?
82
72

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyShenzhen L&A Design HoldingPrice ¥22.60Quanta ServicesPrice $651
DCF Models-74%below the price¥5.77-67%below the price$212
Earnings-Basedn/a-83%below the price$111
Dividend Discountn/a-99%below the price$7.09
Multiples-78%below the price¥5.04-80%below the price$130
Asset-Based-81%below the price¥4.37-94%below the price$39.91
Growth DCF-73%below the price¥6.11-65%below the price$227
Economic Profitn/a-90%below the price$64.82
Growth Earningsn/a-75%below the price$163
Minimum-81%below the price¥4.37-99%below the price$7.09
Maximum-73%below the price¥6.11-65%below the price$227
Median-76%below the price¥5.40-81%below the price$121
Geometric mean-77%below the price¥5.28-87%below the price$82.21

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Shenzhen L&A Design Holding: 10 of 10 models see the stock below the current price.

Quanta Services: 26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.

Shenzhen L&A Design Holding
Price ¥22.60
Fair Value ¥5.46
Bear ¥4.73Bull ¥6.44
Quanta Services
Price $651
Fair Value $163
Bear $107Bull $212

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Shenzhen L&A Design Holding · Industrials

Quality score61 · above median
Fair value upside-76% · bottom 25%

Quanta Services · Industrials

Quality score50 · below median
Fair value upside-75% · bottom 25%

Bottom line

As of Sep 14, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Quanta Services as the less overvalued of the two: Shenzhen L&A Design Holding trades at ¥22.60 versus a fair value of ¥5.46 (-76%), while Quanta Services trades at $651 versus $163 (-75%).

Shenzhen L&A Design Holding has the higher quality score (61/100).

See the full analysis →
Shenzhen L&A Design Holding · Quanta Services

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Related to Shenzhen L&A Design Holding

Microsoft vs NvidiaApple vs MicrosoftNvidia vs Taiwan Semiconductor ManufacturingApple vs Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing

Related to Quanta Services

Microsoft vs Taiwan Semiconductor ManufacturingAlphabet Inc Class C vs Meta PlatformsBroadcom vs MicrosoftMicrosoft vs Micron Technology
Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.