Bindawood Holding Co vs Loblaw Companies: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Bindawood Holding Co (4161) and Loblaw Companies (L) compare, as of Aug 10, 2026.
As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Bindawood Holding Co as the less overvalued of the two: Bindawood Holding Co trades at SAR 4.63 versus a fair value of SAR 4.01 (-13%), while Loblaw Companies trades at C$62.89 versus C$44.44 (-29%).
Bindawood Holding Co
4161.SR · SAR · Consumer Staples
-13%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceSAR 4.63
Fair ValueSAR 4.01
Quality62/100
Loblaw Companies
L.TO · CAD · Consumer Staples
-29%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceC$62.89
Fair ValueC$44.44
Quality70/100
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
Bindawood Holding CoLoblaw Companies
Valuation
19.3×P/E (TTM)29.6×
0.22×P/S (TTM)0.85×
0.92×P/B4.96×
2.2×EV/EBITDA10.4×
—PEG5.23×
2.6%Dividend yield0.9%
SAR 0.12Dividend per shareC$0.56
Profitability
4%Net margin4%
6%Operating margin7%
17%Return on equity24%
4%Return on assets7%
Growth
8%Revenue growth (YoY)4%
9.0%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)4.2%
4.2%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)3.9%
Balance & size
0.11×Debt / equity0.53×
$1BMarket cap$55B
healthyGrowth qualityhealthy
Bindawood Holding Co leads: 9 to 4 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
Bindawood Holding Coof which business quality 61 · market factors 44Loblaw Companiesof which business quality 67 · market factors 61
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
55
69
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
45
51
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
78
94
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
86
93
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
29
45
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
22
54
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
92
100
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
Bindawood Holding Co
DCF ModelsSAR 6.60
Earnings-BasedSAR 2.36
Dividend DiscountSAR 2.19
MultiplesSAR 4.75
Asset-BasedSAR 0.90
Growth DCFSAR 6.29
Economic ProfitSAR 2.80
Growth EarningsSAR 4.28
12 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.
Loblaw Companies
DCF ModelsC$47.64
Earnings-BasedC$28.09
Dividend DiscountC$10.70
MultiplesC$46.88
Asset-BasedC$6.35
Growth DCFC$49.73
Economic ProfitC$25.87
Growth EarningsC$39.55
23 of 25 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
Bindawood Holding Co
Bear SAR 3.01Fair Value SAR 4.01Bull SAR 5.02
SAR 4.63 = current price (white tick)
Loblaw Companies
Bear C$29.22Fair Value C$44.44Bull C$60.15
C$62.89 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Free, no sign-up
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Bindawood Holding Co · Consumer Staples
Quality score62 · above median
Fair value upside-13% · below median
Loblaw Companies · Consumer Staples
Quality score70 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-29% · below median
Bottom line
As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Bindawood Holding Co as the less overvalued of the two: Bindawood Holding Co trades at SAR 4.63 versus a fair value of SAR 4.01 (-13%), while Loblaw Companies trades at C$62.89 versus C$44.44 (-29%).
Loblaw Companies has the higher quality score (70/100).
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
