STOCK COMPARISON
Gigavis Ltd (proposed) vs ASML Holding: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Gigavis Ltd (proposed) (420770) and ASML Holding (ASML) compare, as of Aug 10, 2026.
As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees ASML Holding as the less overvalued of the two: Gigavis Ltd (proposed) trades at KRW 110,300 versus a fair value of KRW 20,724 (-81%), while ASML Holding trades at €1,499 versus €444 (-70%).
Gigavis Ltd (proposed)
420770.KQ · KRW · Health Care
-81%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceKRW 110,300
Fair ValueKRW 20,724
Quality70/100
ASML Holding
ASML.AS · EUR · Information Technology
-70%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price€1,499
Fair Value€444
Quality82/100
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
Gigavis Ltd (proposed)ASML Holding
Valuation
—P/E (TTM)60.6×
0.06×P/S (TTM)19.32×
—P/B34.80×
—EV/EBITDA49.9×
—PEG2.19×
0.5%Dividend yield0.3%
KRW 800Dividend per share€5.90
Profitability
14%Net margin30%
23%Operating margin37%
2%Return on equity54%
-0%Return on assets16%
Growth
-2%Revenue growth (YoY)21%
-19.3%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)15.6%
—Avg. growth/yr (5Y)18.5%
Balance & size
0.10×Debt / equity0.14×
$1BMarket cap$683B
weakGrowth qualityhealthy
ASML Holding leads: 3 to 6 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
Gigavis Ltd (proposed)of which business quality 73 · market factors 57
ASML Holdingof which business quality 79 · market factors 70
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
43
81
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
100
77
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
89
86
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
90
85
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
22
42
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
0
35
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
85
81
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
74
90
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
82
92
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
Gigavis Ltd (proposed)
DCF ModelsKRW 22,006
Earnings-BasedKRW 8,935
MultiplesKRW 16,791
Asset-BasedKRW 11,153
Growth DCFKRW 25,552
Economic ProfitKRW 12,583
Growth EarningsKRW 23,294
24 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.
ASML Holding
DCF Models€708
Earnings-Based€393
Dividend Discount€127
Multiples€342
Asset-Based€34.21
Growth DCF€664
Economic Profit€376
Growth Earnings€570
26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
Gigavis Ltd (proposed)
Bear KRW 15,543Fair Value KRW 20,724Bull KRW 25,905
KRW 110,300 = current price (white tick)
ASML Holding
Bear €339Fair Value €444Bull €740
€1,499 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Gigavis Ltd (proposed) · Health Care
Quality score70 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-81% · bottom 25%
ASML Holding · Information Technology
Quality score82 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-70% · bottom 25%
Bottom line
As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees ASML Holding as the less overvalued of the two: Gigavis Ltd (proposed) trades at KRW 110,300 versus a fair value of KRW 20,724 (-81%), while ASML Holding trades at €1,499 versus €444 (-70%).
ASML Holding has the higher quality score (82/100).
See the full analysis →
More comparisons
Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.
Free · Top-25 report
See the undervalued quality stocks every month
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
