Sanjiang Shopping Club Co vs Loblaw Companies: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Sanjiang Shopping Club Co (601116) and Loblaw Companies (L) compare, as of Aug 11, 2026.
As of Aug 11, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Loblaw Companies as the less overvalued of the two: Sanjiang Shopping Club Co trades at ¥10.72 versus a fair value of ¥4.75 (-56%), while Loblaw Companies trades at C$61.97 versus C$44.44 (-28%).
Sanjiang Shopping Club Co
601116.SHG · CNY · Consumer Staples
-56%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price¥10.72
Fair Value¥4.75
Quality59/100
Loblaw Companies
L.TO · CAD · Consumer Staples
-28%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceC$61.97
Fair ValueC$44.44
Quality70/100
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
Sanjiang Shopping Club CoLoblaw Companies
Valuation
32.8×P/E (TTM)29.6×
1.47×P/S (TTM)0.85×
1.75×P/B4.96×
27.7×EV/EBITDA10.4×
1.45×PEG5.23×
1.0%Dividend yield0.9%
¥0.10Dividend per shareC$0.56
Profitability
5%Net margin4%
6%Operating margin7%
5%Return on equity24%
1%Return on assets7%
Growth
-1%Revenue growth (YoY)4%
-1.3%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)4.2%
-1.8%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)3.9%
Balance & size
—Debt / equity0.53×
$851MMarket cap$55B
weakGrowth qualityhealthy
Loblaw Companies leads: 4 to 9 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
Sanjiang Shopping Club Coof which business quality 58 · market factors 24Loblaw Companiesof which business quality 67 · market factors 60
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
37
69
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
45
51
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
88
94
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
46
93
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
12
44
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
18
50
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
84
100
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
Sanjiang Shopping Club Co
DCF Models¥4.72
Earnings-Based¥3.50
Multiples¥6.61
Asset-Based¥4.02
Growth DCF¥2.13
Economic Profit¥4.43
Growth Earnings¥5.44
21 of 21 models see the stock below the current price.
Loblaw Companies
DCF ModelsC$47.64
Earnings-BasedC$28.09
Dividend DiscountC$10.70
MultiplesC$46.88
Asset-BasedC$6.35
Growth DCFC$49.73
Economic ProfitC$25.87
Growth EarningsC$39.55
22 of 25 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
Sanjiang Shopping Club Co
Bear ¥3.82Fair Value ¥4.75Bull ¥6.61
¥10.72 = current price (white tick)
Loblaw Companies
Bear C$29.22Fair Value C$44.44Bull C$60.15
C$61.97 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Free, no sign-up
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Sanjiang Shopping Club Co · Consumer Staples
Quality score59 · above median
Fair value upside-56% · bottom 25%
Loblaw Companies · Consumer Staples
Quality score70 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-28% · below median
Bottom line
As of Aug 11, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Loblaw Companies as the less overvalued of the two: Sanjiang Shopping Club Co trades at ¥10.72 versus a fair value of ¥4.75 (-56%), while Loblaw Companies trades at C$61.97 versus C$44.44 (-28%).
Loblaw Companies has the higher quality score (70/100).
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
