EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

TUL vs Synnex: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how TUL (6150) and Synnex (SNX) compare, as of Aug 10, 2026.

As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees TUL as the less overvalued of the two: TUL trades at TWD 60.60 versus a fair value of TWD 52.69 (-13%), while Synnex trades at $252 versus $207 (-18%).
TUL
6150.TWO · TWD · Information Technology
-13%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceTWD 60.60
Fair ValueTWD 52.69
Quality61/100
Synnex
SNX · USD · Information Technology
-18%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$252
Fair Value$207
Quality61/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

TULSynnex
Valuation
22.7×P/E (TTM)18.0×
0.38×P/S (TTM)0.29×
1.77×P/B2.38×
7.3×EV/EBITDA9.6×
PEG1.04×
1.1%Dividend yield0.8%
TWD 0.60Dividend per share$1.88
Profitability
3%Net margin2%
7%Operating margin3%
12%Return on equity13%
5%Return on assets3%
Growth
-7%Revenue growth (YoY)31%
15.4%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)0.1%
14.9%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)25.6%
Balance & size
0.25×Debt / equity0.43×
$88MMarket cap$20B
expensiveGrowth qualityhealthy

TUL leads: 8 to 5 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

TULof which business quality 56 · market factors 40 Synnexof which business quality 59 · market factors 74
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
43
43
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
88
41
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
9
57
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
59
47
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
94
89
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
61
46
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
37
87
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
20
86
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
82
100

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

TUL

DCF ModelsTWD 85.41
Earnings-BasedTWD 41.62
Dividend DiscountTWD 179
MultiplesTWD 56.40
Asset-BasedTWD 22.06
Economic ProfitTWD 43.39
Growth EarningsTWD 54.49

11 of 17 models see the stock below the current price.

Synnex

DCF Models$311
Earnings-Based$140
Dividend Discount$32.21
Multiples$212
Asset-Based$70.81
Growth DCF$340
Economic Profit$149
Growth Earnings$196

13 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

TUL
Bear TWD 38.14Fair Value TWD 52.69Bull TWD 65.87
TWD 60.60 = current price (white tick)
Synnex
Bear $155Fair Value $207Bull $259
$252 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

TUL · Information Technology

Quality score61 · above median
Fair value upside-13% · above median

Synnex · Information Technology

Quality score61 · above median
Fair value upside-18% · above median

Bottom line

As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees TUL as the less overvalued of the two: TUL trades at TWD 60.60 versus a fair value of TWD 52.69 (-13%), while Synnex trades at $252 versus $207 (-18%).

TUL has the higher quality score (61/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.