EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Rasan Information Technology vs Marsh & McLennan Companies: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Rasan Information Technology (8313) and Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH) compare, as of Oct 1, 2026.

As of Oct 1, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Marsh & McLennan Companies as the less overvalued of the two: Rasan Information Technology trades at SAR 136 versus a fair value of SAR 33.59 (−75.4%), while Marsh & McLennan Companies trades at $171 versus $78.64 (−53.9%).
Rasan Information Technology
8313.SR · SAR · Financial Services
−75.4%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceSAR 136
Fair ValueSAR 33.59
Quality81/100
Marsh & McLennan Companies
MRSH · USD · Financials
−53.9%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$171
Fair Value$78.64
Quality63/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green is the better side of a row, red the weaker one (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper). Grey rows are for reference only and are not scored.

betterweakerfor reference, not scored

Rasan Information TechnologyMarsh & McLennan Companies
Valuation
28.9×P/E (TTM)20.9×
21.4×Forward P/E (FY2027)15.0×
11.54×P/S (TTM)2.96×
14.49×P/B5.47× · book value is mostly goodwill
24.5×EV/EBITDA12.7×
n/aPEG1.50×
−75.4%Fair value upside−53.9%
n/aDividend yield2.2%
n/aDividend per share$3.69
Profitability
33.5%Operating margin26.3%
29.62×EBIT margin trend (5Y)1.30×
48.4%Return on equity25.9%
20.4%Return on assets7.2%
Growth
75.3%Revenue growth (YoY)6.2%
59.0%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)9.2%
72.0%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)9.4%
+69.0%Value creation/yr+18.8%
Balance & size
339.8×Interest coverage (EBIT/interest)6.5×
n/aDebt / equity1.21×
$3BMarket cap$83B
healthyGrowth qualityhealthy
Forward P/E: price divided by the analyst consensus for the first fiscal year that has not started yet. The current year carries special items from quarters already reported.
Valuation multiples (P/E, P/S, P/B, EV/EBITDA) are shown but not scored here: the two companies sit in different sectors, and multiples only compare fairly between similar business models. PEG stays scored, as it relates the P/E to growth.

Rasan Information Technology leads: 7 to 1 metric wins.

n/a = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Rasan Information Technologyof which business quality 80 · market factors 62 Marsh & McLennan Companiesof which business quality 60 · market factors 49
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
78
55
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
99
50
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
90
75
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
94
35
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
33
62
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
77
84
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
48
39
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
68
25
Net IssuanceShare count: buybacks or dilution?
67
93

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyRasan Information TechnologyPrice SAR 136Marsh & McLennan CompaniesPrice $171
Dividend Discountn/a−64.5%below the price$60.68
Multiples−80.2%below the priceSAR 27.08−53.8%below the price$78.82
Asset-Based−95.5%below the priceSAR 6.10−87.6%below the price$21.20
Economic Profit−76.7%below the priceSAR 31.77−62.6%below the price$63.81
Minimum−95.5%below the priceSAR 6.10−87.6%below the price$21.20
Maximum−76.7%below the priceSAR 31.77−53.8%below the price$78.82
Median−80.2%below the priceSAR 27.08−63.5%below the price$62.25
Geometric mean−87.3%below the priceSAR 17.38−70.5%below the price$50.43

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Rasan Information Technology: 4 of 4 models see the stock below the current price.

Marsh & McLennan Companies: 6 of 6 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.

Rasan Information Technology
Price SAR 136
Fair Value SAR 33.59
Bear SAR 21.17Bull SAR 88.68
Marsh & McLennan Companies
Price $171
Fair Value $78.64
Bear $53.56Bull $137

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Rasan Information Technology · Financial Services

Quality score81 · Top 25%
Fair value upside−75.4% · bottom 25%

Marsh & McLennan Companies · Financials

Quality score63 · Top 25%
Fair value upside−53.9% · bottom 25%

Bottom line

As of Oct 1, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Marsh & McLennan Companies as the less overvalued of the two: Rasan Information Technology trades at SAR 136 versus a fair value of SAR 33.59 (−75.4%), while Marsh & McLennan Companies trades at $171 versus $78.64 (−53.9%).

Rasan Information Technology has the higher quality score (81/100).

Open Marsh & McLennan Companies live analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.