EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Amphenol vs Jadason Enterprises: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Amphenol (APH) and Jadason Enterprises (J03) compare, as of Oct 2, 2026.

As of Oct 2, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Jadason Enterprises as the less overvalued of the two: Amphenol trades at $85.67 versus a fair value of $71.77 (−16.2%), while Jadason Enterprises trades at S$0.02 versus S$0.02 (−10.0%).
Amphenol
APH · USD · Information Technology
−16.2%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$85.67
Fair Value$71.77
Quality56/100
Jadason Enterprises
J03.SG · SGD · Information Technology
−10.0%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceS$0.02
Fair ValueS$0.02
Quality64/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green is the better side of a row, red the weaker one (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper). Grey rows are for reference only and are not scored.

betterweakerfor reference, not scored

AmphenolJadason Enterprises
Valuation
42.4×P/E (TTM)n/a
26.1×Forward P/E (FY2027)n/a
7.62×P/S (TTM)0.68×
16.47×P/B4.15×
23.7×EV/EBITDAn/a
0.93×PEG0.67×
−16.2%Fair value upside−10.0%
0.5%Dividend yieldn/a
$0.46Dividend per sharen/a
Profitability
29.8%Operating margin-9.8%
1.35×EBIT margin trend (5Y)n/a
38.1%Return on equity33.2%
14.5%Return on assets-5.4%
Growth
55.0%Revenue growth (YoY)-2.8%
22.3%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)-3.3%
21.8%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)-6.7%
+24.0%Value creation/yrn/a
Balance & size
16.2×Interest coverage (EBIT/interest)n/a
1.09×Debt / equityn/a
$221BMarket cap$20M
healthyGrowth qualityweak
Forward P/E: price divided by the analyst consensus for the first fiscal year that has not started yet. The current year carries special items from quarters already reported. Amphenol: FY 2026 earnings estimate probably distorted by a special item known to analysts (2.67 is not between the FY 2025 actual of 3.34 and the FY 2027 estimate of 3.28).

Amphenol leads: 5 to 4 metric wins.

n/a = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Amphenolof which business quality 57 · market factors 64 Jadason Enterprisesof which business quality 60 · market factors 39
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
67
67
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
70
83
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
72
0
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
78
61
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
29
100
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
37
8
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
69
52
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
85
53
Net IssuanceShare count: buybacks or dilution?
0
82

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyAmphenolPrice $85.67Jadason EnterprisesPrice S$0.02
DCF Models−37.9%below the price$53.19+50.0%above the priceS$0.03
Earnings-Based−72.4%below the price$23.64−50.0%below the priceS$0.01
Dividend Discount−92.7%below the price$6.22n/a
Multiples−54.1%below the price$39.290%close to the priceS$0.02
Asset-Based−95.8%below the price$3.64n/a
Growth DCF−47.9%below the price$44.66n/a
Economic Profit−73.7%below the price$22.50−50.0%below the priceS$0.01
Growth Earnings−51.3%below the price$41.71+50.0%above the priceS$0.03
Minimum−95.8%below the price$3.64−50.0%below the priceS$0.01
Maximum−37.9%below the price$53.19+50.0%above the priceS$0.03
Median−63.3%below the price$31.470%close to the priceS$0.02
Geometric mean−74.8%below the price$21.57−10.9%close to the priceS$0.02

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Amphenol: 26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Jadason Enterprises: 2 of 7 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.

Amphenol
Price $85.67
Fair Value $71.77
Bear $46.41Bull $103
Jadason Enterprises
Price S$0.02
Fair Value S$0.02
Bear S$0.02Bull S$0.02

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Amphenol · Information Technology

Quality score56 · above median
Fair value upside−16.2% · above median

Jadason Enterprises · Information Technology

Quality score64 · above median
Fair value upside−10.0% · above median

Bottom line

As of Oct 2, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Jadason Enterprises as the less overvalued of the two: Amphenol trades at $85.67 versus a fair value of $71.77 (−16.2%), while Jadason Enterprises trades at S$0.02 versus S$0.02 (−10.0%).

Jadason Enterprises has the higher quality score (64/100).

Open Jadason Enterprises live analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.