STOCK COMPARISON
Bossard Holding vs WW Grainger: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Bossard Holding (BOSN) and WW Grainger (GWW) compare, as of Aug 10, 2026.
As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Bossard Holding as the less overvalued of the two: Bossard Holding trades at CHF 231 versus a fair value of CHF 126 (-45%), while WW Grainger trades at $1,278 versus $626 (-51%).
Bossard Holding
BOSN.SW · CHF · Industrials
-45%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceCHF 231
Fair ValueCHF 126
Quality68/100
WW Grainger
GWW · USD · Industrials
-51%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$1,278
Fair Value$626
Quality71/100
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
Bossard HoldingWW Grainger
Valuation
21.9×P/E (TTM)37.0×
1.82×P/S (TTM)3.53×
5.13×P/B15.69×
17.1×EV/EBITDA21.6×
1.18×PEG2.15×
2.0%Dividend yield0.7%
CHF 3.90Dividend per share$9.04
Profitability
7%Net margin10%
10%Operating margin17%
19%Return on equity46%
8%Return on assets20%
Growth
10%Revenue growth (YoY)10%
-2.5%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)5.6%
5.6%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)8.7%
Balance & size
0.68×Debt / equity0.57×
$2BMarket cap$65B
healthyGrowth qualityhealthy
WW Grainger leads: 6 to 8 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
Bossard Holdingof which business quality 64 · market factors 78
WW Graingerof which business quality 68 · market factors 70
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
64
89
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
46
44
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
48
46
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
64
72
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
99
55
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
57
69
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
86
66
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
87
76
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
81
100
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
Bossard Holding
DCF ModelsCHF 151
Earnings-BasedCHF 71.81
Dividend DiscountCHF 60.10
MultiplesCHF 215
Asset-BasedCHF 39.97
Growth DCFCHF 130
Economic ProfitCHF 87.80
Growth EarningsCHF 201
23 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.
WW Grainger
DCF Models$615
Earnings-Based$340
Dividend Discount$169
Multiples$703
Asset-Based$58.76
Growth DCF$540
Economic Profit$467
Growth Earnings$668
26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
Bossard Holding
Bear CHF 72.20Fair Value CHF 126Bull CHF 195
CHF 231 = current price (white tick)
WW Grainger
Bear $368Fair Value $626Bull $949
$1,278 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Bossard Holding · Industrials
Quality score68 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-45% · below median
WW Grainger · Industrials
Quality score71 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-51% · below median
Bottom line
As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Bossard Holding as the less overvalued of the two: Bossard Holding trades at CHF 231 versus a fair value of CHF 126 (-45%), while WW Grainger trades at $1,278 versus $626 (-51%).
WW Grainger has the higher quality score (71/100).
See the full analysis →
More comparisons
Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.
Free · Top-25 report
See the undervalued quality stocks every month
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
