EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

A-smart Holdings vs Cintas: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how A-smart Holdings (BQC) and Cintas (CTAS) compare, as of Aug 18, 2026.

As of Aug 18, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees A-smart Holdings as the less overvalued of the two: A-smart Holdings trades at S$0.09 versus a fair value of S$0.08 (-12%), while Cintas trades at $198 versus $95.19 (-52%).
A-smart Holdings
BQC.SG · SGD · Industrials
-12%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceS$0.09
Fair ValueS$0.08
Quality32/100
Cintas
CTAS · USD · Industrials
-52%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$198
Fair Value$95.19
Quality78/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

A-smart HoldingsCintas
Valuation
P/E (TTM)42.0×
3.26×P/S (TTM)7.33×
0.79×P/B16.06×
EV/EBITDA27.0×
0.28×PEG3.06×
Dividend yield1.0%
Dividend per share$1.74
Profitability
-16%Net margin18%
-11%Operating margin24%
-4%Return on equity41%
-2%Return on assets16%
Growth
-8%Revenue growth (YoY)9%
8.2%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)8.5%
1.5%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)9.6%
Balance & size
Debt / equity0.47×
$22MMarket cap$83B
weakGrowth qualityhealthy

Cintas leads: 3 to 7 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

A-smart Holdingsof which business quality 32 · market factors 30 Cintasof which business quality 74 · market factors 53
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
8
91
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
27
53
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
50
67
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
63
70
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
33
71
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
50
74
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
22
46
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
22
40
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
0
90

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

A-smart Holdings

Asset-BasedS$0.07

1 of 1 models see the stock below the current price.

Cintas

DCF Models$96.89
Earnings-Based$48.67
Dividend Discount$30.85
Multiples$76.91
Asset-Based$8.61
Growth DCF$74.33
Economic Profit$58.94
Growth Earnings$81.35

26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

A-smart Holdings
Bear S$0.05Fair Value S$0.08Bull S$0.10
S$0.09 = current price (white tick)
Cintas
Bear $55.52Fair Value $95.19Bull $121
$198 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

A-smart Holdings · Industrials

Quality score32 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside-12% · above median

Cintas · Industrials

Quality score78 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-52% · below median

Bottom line

As of Aug 18, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees A-smart Holdings as the less overvalued of the two: A-smart Holdings trades at S$0.09 versus a fair value of S$0.08 (-12%), while Cintas trades at $198 versus $95.19 (-52%).

Cintas has the higher quality score (78/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.