ContextVision AB vs Veeva Systems Inc Class A: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how ContextVision AB (CONTX) and Veeva Systems Inc Class A (VEEV) compare, as of Aug 10, 2026.
As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Veeva Systems Inc Class A as the less overvalued of the two: ContextVision AB trades at NOK 3.40 versus a fair value of NOK 0.74 (-78%), while Veeva Systems Inc Class A trades at $230 versus $95.12 (-59%).
ContextVision AB
CONTX.OL · NOK · Health Care
-78%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceNOK 3.40
Fair ValueNOK 0.74
Quality52/100
Veeva Systems Inc Class A
VEEV · USD · Health Care
-59%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$230
Fair Value$95.12
Quality72/100
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
ContextVision ABVeeva Systems Inc Class A
Valuation
56.7×P/E (TTM)33.6×
2.33×P/S (TTM)9.31×
2.75×P/B4.28×
39.2×EV/EBITDA28.7×
4.07×PEG0.85×
Profitability
4%Net margin28%
0%Operating margin31%
5%Return on equity14%
1%Return on assets7%
Growth
9%Revenue growth (YoY)16%
-2.2%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)14.0%
3.1%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)16.9%
Balance & size
$27MMarket cap$31B
expensiveGrowth qualityhealthy
Veeva Systems Inc Class A leads: 2 to 10 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
ContextVision ABof which business quality 54 · market factors 33Veeva Systems Inc Class Aof which business quality 72 · market factors 48
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
44
57
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
18
65
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
63
33
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
58
55
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
25
52
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
18
31
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
82
72
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
ContextVision AB
DCF ModelsNOK 1.07
Earnings-BasedNOK 0.19
Dividend DiscountNOK 3.29
MultiplesNOK 0.62
Asset-BasedNOK 0.83
Growth DCFNOK 0.97
Economic ProfitNOK 0.83
Growth EarningsNOK 0.19
23 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.
Veeva Systems Inc Class A
DCF Models$214
Earnings-Based$142
Dividend Discount$0.41
Multiples$93.60
Asset-Based$29.76
Growth DCF$200
Economic Profit$57.47
Growth Earnings$185
21 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
ContextVision AB
Bear NOK 0.60Fair Value NOK 0.74Bull NOK 0.74
NOK 3.40 = current price (white tick)
Veeva Systems Inc Class A
Bear $71.34Fair Value $95.12Bull $146
$230 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Free, no sign-up
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
ContextVision AB · Health Care
Quality score52 · above median
Fair value upside-78% · bottom 25%
Veeva Systems Inc Class A · Health Care
Quality score72 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-59% · below median
Bottom line
As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Veeva Systems Inc Class A as the less overvalued of the two: ContextVision AB trades at NOK 3.40 versus a fair value of NOK 0.74 (-78%), while Veeva Systems Inc Class A trades at $230 versus $95.12 (-59%).
Veeva Systems Inc Class A has the higher quality score (72/100).
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
