Fnmam vs Reckitt Benckiser Group: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Fnmam (FNMAM) and Reckitt Benckiser Group (RKT) compare, as of Aug 11, 2026.
As of Aug 11, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Reckitt Benckiser Group as the more attractively valued of the two: Fnmam trades at $14.00 versus a fair value of $1.93 (-86%), while Reckitt Benckiser Group trades at £53.42 versus £63.74 (+19%).
Fnmam
FNMAM · USD · Financials
-86%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$14.00
Fair Value$1.93
Quality53/100
Reckitt Benckiser Group
RKT.LSE · GBX · Consumer Staples
+19%
upside to fair value
undervalued
Price£53.42
Fair Value£63.74
Quality75/100
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
FnmamReckitt Benckiser Group
Valuation
—P/E (TTM)10.3×
0.48×P/S (TTM)3.03×
0.12×P/B5.55×
—EV/EBITDA12.9×
—PEG2.40×
—Dividend yield4.3%
—Dividend per share£2.12
Profitability
53%Net margin22%
73%Operating margin27%
14%Return on equity44%
0%Return on assets9%
Growth
-4%Revenue growth (YoY)-3%
6.1%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)-0.6%
4.8%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)0.3%
Balance & size
38.12×Debt / equity0.96×
$13BMarket cap$43B
mixedGrowth qualityweak
Fnmam leads: 6 to 4 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
Fnmamof which business quality 49 · market factors 10Reckitt Benckiser Groupof which business quality 70 · market factors 57
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
35
73
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
25
64
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
67
97
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
19
93
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
10
39
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
0
46
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
82
100
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
Fnmam
Earnings-Based$35.98
Multiples$29.57
Asset-Based$12.73
Economic Profit$22.36
1 of 5 models see the stock below the current price.
Reckitt Benckiser Group
DCF Models£63.51
Earnings-Based£54.08
Dividend Discount£34.75
Multiples£77.52
Asset-Based£8.17
Growth DCF£32.07
Economic Profit£54.47
Growth Earnings£87.14
12 of 25 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
Fnmam
Bear $1.45Fair Value $1.93Bull $2.42
$14.00 = current price (white tick)
Reckitt Benckiser Group
Bear £36.55Fair Value £63.74Bull £110
£53.42 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Free, no sign-up
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Fnmam · Financials
Quality score53 · below median
Fair value upside-86% · bottom 25%
Reckitt Benckiser Group · Consumer Staples
Quality score75 · Top 25%
Fair value upside+19% · above median
Bottom line
As of Aug 11, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Reckitt Benckiser Group as the more attractively valued of the two: Fnmam trades at $14.00 versus a fair value of $1.93 (-86%), while Reckitt Benckiser Group trades at £53.42 versus £63.74 (+19%).
Reckitt Benckiser Group has the higher quality score (75/100).
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
