EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Godrej Industries vs 3M: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Godrej Industries (GODREJIND) and 3M (MMM) compare, as of Oct 1, 2026.

As of Oct 1, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Godrej Industries as the less overvalued of the two: Godrej Industries trades at ₹1,020 versus a fair value of ₹555 (−45.5%), while 3M trades at $164 versus $72.78 (−55.7%).
Godrej Industries
GODREJIND.NSE · INR · Industrials
−45.5%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price₹1,020
Fair Value₹555
Quality31/100
3M
MMM · USD · Industrials
−55.7%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$164
Fair Value$72.78
Quality62/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green is the better side of a row, red the weaker one (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper). Grey rows are for reference only and are not scored.

betterweakerfor reference, not scored

Godrej Industries3M
Valuation
29.8×P/E (TTM)29.6×
n/aP/E ex one-offs (FY2025)45.5×
n/aForward P/E (FY2027)16.8×
2.76×P/S (TTM)3.44×
3.13×P/B18.42× · book value is mostly goodwill
25.4×EV/EBITDA14.2×
n/aPEG1.61×
−45.5%Fair value upside−55.7%
0.2%Dividend yield1.8%
n/aDividend per share$3.02
Profitability
8.1%Operating margin20.4%
1.34×EBIT margin trend (5Y)0.85×
10.8%Return on equity81.9%
3.7%Return on assets8.7%
Growth
-4.7%Revenue growth (YoY)2.5%
7.9%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)n/a
17.4%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)n/a
+17.7%Value creation/yr−11.4%
Balance & size
0.7×Interest coverage (EBIT/interest)6.3×
1.92×Debt / equity2.33×
$4BMarket cap$87B
expensiveGrowth qualitymixed
The P/E excluding one-off items is only shown where the special items are documented in the accounts (our own raw data or SEC filings). If one side lacks it, the reported P/E stays scored.
Forward P/E: price divided by the analyst consensus for the first fiscal year that has not started yet. The current year carries special items from quarters already reported.

3M leads: 5 to 7 metric wins.

Group holding company: GODREJIND (51 %) consolidates subsidiaries in full but owns only the stated share. Revenue, EBITDA and margin ratios are therefore restated for its own shareholders; earnings per share, P/E and return on equity already were.

n/a = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Godrej Industriesof which business quality 27 · market factors 47 3Mof which business quality 56 · market factors 55
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
23
62
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
41
32
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
0
33
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
5
37
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
42
97
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
68
65
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
42
52
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
32
50
Net IssuanceShare count: buybacks or dilution?
82
100

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyGodrej IndustriesPrice ₹1,0203MPrice $164
DCF Models−16.7%below the price₹849−41.4%below the price$96.20
Earnings-Based−17.6%below the price₹840−53.8%below the price$75.91
Dividend Discount−98.2%below the price₹18.53−83.1%below the price$27.75
Multiples−31.4%below the price₹700−47.2%below the price$86.69
Asset-Based−78.2%below the price₹222−96.3%below the price$6.11
Growth DCFn/a−67.1%below the price$54.00
Economic Profit−67.2%below the price₹334−80.9%below the price$31.31
Minimum−98.2%below the price₹18.53−96.3%below the price$6.11
Maximum−16.7%below the price₹849−41.4%below the price$96.20
Median−49.3%below the price₹517−67.1%below the price$54.00
Geometric mean−70.9%below the price₹297−75.3%below the price$40.59

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Godrej Industries: 8 of 9 models see the stock below the current price.

3M: 12 of 12 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.

Godrej Industries
Price ₹1,020
Fair Value ₹555
Bear ₹506Bull ₹943
3M
Price $164
Fair Value $72.78
Bear $42.85Bull $93.35

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Godrej Industries · Industrials

Quality score31 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside−45.5% · below median

3M · Industrials

Quality score62 · Top 25%
Fair value upside−55.7% · bottom 25%

Bottom line

As of Oct 1, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Godrej Industries as the less overvalued of the two: Godrej Industries trades at ₹1,020 versus a fair value of ₹555 (−45.5%), while 3M trades at $164 versus $72.78 (−55.7%).

3M has the higher quality score (62/100).

Open Godrej Industries live analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.