InfuSystems Holdings vs Abbott Laboratories: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how InfuSystems Holdings (INFU) and Abbott Laboratories (ABT) compare, as of Aug 11, 2026.
As of Aug 11, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Abbott Laboratories as the less overvalued of the two: InfuSystems Holdings trades at $12.49 versus a fair value of $7.22 (-42%), while Abbott Laboratories trades at $108 versus $74.79 (-31%).
InfuSystems Holdings
INFU · USD · Health Care
-42%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$12.49
Fair Value$7.22
Quality79/100
Abbott Laboratories
ABT · USD · Health Care
-31%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$108
Fair Value$74.79
Quality67/100
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
InfuSystems HoldingsAbbott Laboratories
Valuation
25.5×P/E (TTM)27.7×
1.34×P/S (TTM)3.89×
3.32×P/B3.36×
8.6×EV/EBITDA15.1×
1.73×PEG1.47×
Profitability
6%Net margin14%
5%Operating margin13%
14%Return on equity12%
7%Return on assets6%
Growth
-3%Revenue growth (YoY)8%
9.3%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)0.5%
8.1%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)5.1%
Balance & size
0.34×Debt / equity0.19×
$190MMarket cap$175B
healthyGrowth qualityhealthy
InfuSystems Holdings leads: 8 to 5 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
InfuSystems Holdingsof which business quality 78 · market factors 71Abbott Laboratoriesof which business quality 66 · market factors 51
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
65
50
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
79
47
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
89
65
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
15
83
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
92
40
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
100
33
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
95
84
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
InfuSystems Holdings
DCF Models$11.26
Earnings-Based$2.98
Dividend Discount$2.41
Multiples$7.04
Asset-Based$1.90
Growth DCF$12.02
Economic Profit$2.46
Growth Earnings$5.56
21 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.
Abbott Laboratories
DCF Models$73.01
Earnings-Based$29.42
Dividend Discount$39.73
Multiples$70.72
Asset-Based$20.05
Growth DCF$67.02
Economic Profit$37.49
Growth Earnings$70.25
26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
InfuSystems Holdings
Bear $5.42Fair Value $7.22Bull $9.03
$12.49 = current price (white tick)
Abbott Laboratories
Bear $51.84Fair Value $74.79Bull $94.43
$108 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Free, no sign-up
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
InfuSystems Holdings · Health Care
Quality score79 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-42% · below median
Abbott Laboratories · Health Care
Quality score67 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-31% · below median
Bottom line
As of Aug 11, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Abbott Laboratories as the less overvalued of the two: InfuSystems Holdings trades at $12.49 versus a fair value of $7.22 (-42%), while Abbott Laboratories trades at $108 versus $74.79 (-31%).
InfuSystems Holdings has the higher quality score (79/100).
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
