EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

inTest vs ASML Holding: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how inTest (INTT) and ASML Holding (ASML) compare, as of Aug 10, 2026.

As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees inTest as the less overvalued of the two: inTest trades at $14.05 versus a fair value of $5.92 (-58%), while ASML Holding trades at €1,514 versus €444 (-71%).
inTest
INTT · USD · Information Technology
-58%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$14.05
Fair Value$5.92
Quality44/100
ASML Holding
ASML.AS · EUR · Information Technology
-71%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price€1,514
Fair Value€444
Quality82/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

inTestASML Holding
Valuation
470.0×P/E (TTM)60.6×
1.95×P/S (TTM)19.31×
2.28×P/B34.78×
37.4×EV/EBITDA49.8×
PEG2.19×
Dividend yield0.3%
Dividend per share€5.90
Profitability
0%Net margin30%
5%Operating margin37%
1%Return on equity54%
1%Return on assets16%
Growth
27%Revenue growth (YoY)21%
-0.9%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)15.6%
16.2%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)18.5%
Balance & size
0.01×Debt / equity0.14×
$236MMarket cap$682B
mixedGrowth qualityhealthy

ASML Holding leads: 5 to 7 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

inTestof which business quality 48 · market factors 56 ASML Holdingof which business quality 79 · market factors 70
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
27
81
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
16
77
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
46
86
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
82
85
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
53
42
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
12
35
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
73
81
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
78
90
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
63
92

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

inTest

DCF Models$5.73
Dividend Discount$0.85
Multiples$5.55
Asset-Based$5.53
Growth DCF$6.47

13 of 13 models see the stock below the current price.

ASML Holding

DCF Models€708
Earnings-Based€393
Dividend Discount€127
Multiples€342
Asset-Based€34.21
Growth DCF€664
Economic Profit€376
Growth Earnings€570

26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

inTest
Bear $4.32Fair Value $5.92Bull $7.50
$14.05 = current price (white tick)
ASML Holding
Bear €339Fair Value €444Bull €740
€1,514 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

inTest · Information Technology

Quality score44 · below median
Fair value upside-58% · below median

ASML Holding · Information Technology

Quality score82 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-71% · bottom 25%

Bottom line

As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees inTest as the less overvalued of the two: inTest trades at $14.05 versus a fair value of $5.92 (-58%), while ASML Holding trades at €1,514 versus €444 (-71%).

ASML Holding has the higher quality score (82/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.