EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Pyramid Technoplast Ord (bse) vs Stora Enso Oyj ser. R: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Pyramid Technoplast Ord (bse) (PYRAMID) and Stora Enso Oyj ser. R (STE-R) compare, as of Aug 18, 2026.

As of Aug 18, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Stora Enso Oyj ser. R as the more attractively valued of the two: Pyramid Technoplast Ord (bse) trades at ₹167 versus a fair value of ₹134 (-19%), while Stora Enso Oyj ser. R trades at SEK 104 versus SEK 126 (+21%).
Pyramid Technoplast Ord (bse)
PYRAMID.NSE · INR · Consumer Cyclical
-19%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price₹167
Fair Value₹134
Quality41/100
Stora Enso Oyj ser. R
STE-R.ST · SEK · Materials
+21%
upside to fair value
undervalued
PriceSEK 104
Fair ValueSEK 126
Quality55/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Pyramid Technoplast Ord (bse)Stora Enso Oyj ser. R
Valuation
21.0×P/E (TTM)11.7×
0.93×P/S (TTM)0.93×
2.29×P/B0.81×
12.5×EV/EBITDA17.0×
PEG40.97×
0.3%Dividend yield0.2%
₹0.50Dividend per share
Profitability
4%Net margin7%
8%Operating margin5%
11%Return on equity6%
6%Return on assets1%
Growth
14%Revenue growth (YoY)-0%
12.4%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)-7.2%
16.8%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)1.7%
Balance & size
0.26×Debt / equity0.29×
$66MMarket cap$9B
expensiveGrowth qualityweak

Pyramid Technoplast Ord (bse) leads: 10 to 3 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Pyramid Technoplast Ord (bse)of which business quality 43 · market factors 56 Stora Enso Oyj ser. Rof which business quality 52 · market factors 45
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
53
33
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
35
57
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
0
19
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
70
63
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
16
88
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
75
81
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
45
32
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
53
27
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
81
82

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Pyramid Technoplast Ord (bse)

Earnings-Based₹122
Dividend Discount₹8.16
Multiples₹151
Asset-Based₹50.39
Economic Profit₹77.04
Growth Earnings₹185

12 of 16 models see the stock below the current price.

Stora Enso Oyj ser. R

DCF ModelsSEK 4.47
Earnings-BasedSEK 8.34
Dividend DiscountSEK 2.83
MultiplesSEK 14.82
Asset-BasedSEK 9.07
Economic ProfitSEK 10.34
Growth EarningsSEK 11.31

15 of 15 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Pyramid Technoplast Ord (bse)
Bear ₹99.89Fair Value ₹134Bull ₹180
₹167 = current price (white tick)
Stora Enso Oyj ser. R
Bear SEK 96.71Fair Value SEK 126Bull SEK 140
SEK 104 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Pyramid Technoplast Ord (bse) · Consumer Cyclical

Quality score41 · below median
Fair value upside-19% · below median

Stora Enso Oyj ser. R · Materials

Quality score55 · above median
Fair value upside+21% · Top 25%

Bottom line

As of Aug 18, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Stora Enso Oyj ser. R as the more attractively valued of the two: Pyramid Technoplast Ord (bse) trades at ₹167 versus a fair value of ₹134 (-19%), while Stora Enso Oyj ser. R trades at SEK 104 versus SEK 126 (+21%).

Stora Enso Oyj ser. R has the higher quality score (55/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.