STOCK COMPARISON
Schouw & vs Citic Pacific: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Schouw & (SCHO) and Citic Pacific (0267) compare, as of Aug 10, 2026.
As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Citic Pacific as the more attractively valued of the two: Schouw & trades at DKK 619 versus a fair value of DKK 489 (-21%), while Citic Pacific trades at HK$11.89 versus HK$22.56 (+90%).
Schouw &
SCHO.CO · DKK · Consumer Staples
-21%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceDKK 619
Fair ValueDKK 489
Quality62/100
Citic Pacific
0267.HK · HKD · Industrials
+90%
upside to fair value
undervalued
PriceHK$11.89
Fair ValueHK$22.56
Quality45/100
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
Schouw &Citic Pacific
Valuation
20.3×P/E (TTM)4.8×
0.41×P/S (TTM)0.34×
1.24×P/B0.37×
6.6×EV/EBITDA2.8×
3.11×PEG1.76×
2.8%Dividend yield5.2%
DKK 17.00Dividend per shareHK$0.59
Profitability
2%Net margin6%
4%Operating margin30%
6%Return on equity8%
4%Return on assets1%
Growth
-3%Revenue growth (YoY)-2%
1.5%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)10.2%
9.9%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)10.9%
Balance & size
0.37×Debt / equity2.03×
$2BMarket cap$41B
mixedGrowth qualityexpensive
Citic Pacific leads: 2 to 12 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
Schouw &of which business quality 60 · market factors 50
Citic Pacificof which business quality 39 · market factors 50
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
42
20
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
33
54
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
64
23
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
53
20
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
95
69
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
78
74
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
36
36
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
42
45
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
94
82
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
Schouw &
DCF ModelsDKK 1,144
Earnings-BasedDKK 562
Dividend DiscountDKK 287
MultiplesDKK 547
Asset-BasedDKK 335
Growth DCFDKK 1,600
Economic ProfitDKK 407
7 of 13 models see the stock below the current price.
Citic Pacific
DCF ModelsHK$25.60
Earnings-BasedHK$65.33
Dividend DiscountHK$11.60
MultiplesHK$41.60
Asset-BasedHK$20.07
Economic ProfitHK$26.48
1 of 11 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
Schouw &
Bear DKK 367Fair Value DKK 489Bull DKK 612
DKK 619 = current price (white tick)
Citic Pacific
Bear HK$16.92Fair Value HK$22.56Bull HK$28.20
HK$11.89 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Schouw & · Consumer Staples
Quality score62 · above median
Fair value upside-21% · below median
Citic Pacific · Industrials
Quality score45 · below median
Fair value upside+90% · Top 25%
Bottom line
As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Citic Pacific as the more attractively valued of the two: Schouw & trades at DKK 619 versus a fair value of DKK 489 (-21%), while Citic Pacific trades at HK$11.89 versus HK$22.56 (+90%).
Schouw & has the higher quality score (62/100).
See the full analysis →
More comparisons
Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.
Free · Top-25 report
See the undervalued quality stocks every month
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
