Silver Scott Mines vs Fresenius SE & Co. KGaA: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Silver Scott Mines (SILS) and Fresenius SE & Co. KGaA (FRE) compare, as of Aug 10, 2026.
As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Fresenius SE & Co. KGaA as the less overvalued of the two: Silver Scott Mines trades at $0.05 versus a fair value of $0.01 (-80%), while Fresenius SE & Co. KGaA trades at €46.91 versus €32.15 (-31%).
Silver Scott Mines
SILS · USD · Materials
-80%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$0.05
Fair Value$0.01
Quality49/100
Fresenius SE & Co. KGaA
FRE.XETRA · EUR · Health Care
-31%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price€46.91
Fair Value€32.15
Quality57/100
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
Silver Scott MinesFresenius SE & Co. KGaA
Valuation
—P/E (TTM)15.6×
—P/S (TTM)1.18×
19.18×P/B1.42×
—EV/EBITDA11.5×
—PEG0.77×
—Dividend yield2.5%
—Dividend per share€1.05
Profitability
0%Net margin6%
0%Operating margin10%
—Return on equity8%
0%Return on assets3%
Growth
0%Revenue growth (YoY)2%
-58.9%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)2.4%
—Avg. growth/yr (5Y)-8.8%
Balance & size
—Debt / equity0.48×
$7MMarket cap$27B
weakGrowth qualityweak
Fresenius SE & Co. KGaA leads: 0 to 6 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
Silver Scott Minesof which business quality 49 · market factors 20Fresenius SE & Co. KGaAof which business quality 55 · market factors 60
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
1
32
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
100
57
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
62
92
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
0
78
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
40
49
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
9
60
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
88
81
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
No model data.
Fresenius SE & Co. KGaA
DCF Models€28.71
Earnings-Based€17.93
Dividend Discount€16.93
Multiples€43.76
Asset-Based€22.73
Growth DCF€25.33
Economic Profit€23.30
Growth Earnings€39.20
21 of 25 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
Fresenius SE & Co. KGaA
Bear €27.44Fair Value €32.15Bull €48.50
€46.91 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Free, no sign-up
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Silver Scott Mines · Materials
Quality score49 · below median
Fair value upside-80% · bottom 25%
Fresenius SE & Co. KGaA · Health Care
Quality score57 · above median
Fair value upside-31% · below median
Bottom line
As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Fresenius SE & Co. KGaA as the less overvalued of the two: Silver Scott Mines trades at $0.05 versus a fair value of $0.01 (-80%), while Fresenius SE & Co. KGaA trades at €46.91 versus €32.15 (-31%).
Fresenius SE & Co. KGaA has the higher quality score (57/100).
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
