EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Zomedica vs Abbott Laboratories: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Zomedica (ZOMDF) and Abbott Laboratories (ABT) compare, as of Aug 11, 2026.

As of Aug 11, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Abbott Laboratories as the less overvalued of the two: Zomedica trades at $0.08 versus a fair value of $0.06 (-33%), while Abbott Laboratories trades at $108 versus $74.79 (-31%).
Zomedica
ZOMDF · USD · Healthcare
-33%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$0.08
Fair Value$0.06
Quality44/100
Abbott Laboratories
ABT · USD · Health Care
-31%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$108
Fair Value$74.79
Quality67/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

ZomedicaAbbott Laboratories
Valuation
P/E (TTM)27.7×
2.86×P/S (TTM)3.89×
0.85×P/B3.36×
EV/EBITDA15.1×
PEG1.47×
Profitability
-66%Net margin14%
-56%Operating margin13%
-19%Return on equity12%
-12%Return on assets6%
Growth
35%Revenue growth (YoY)8%
19.2%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)0.5%
Avg. growth/yr (5Y)5.1%
Balance & size
Debt / equity0.19×
$98MMarket cap$175B
mixedGrowth qualityhealthy

Even match: 4 to 4 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Zomedicaof which business quality 44 · market factors 42 Abbott Laboratoriesof which business quality 66 · market factors 51
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
8
50
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
51
47
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
0
71
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
65
80
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
98
65
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
17
83
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
43
40
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
70
33
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
82
84

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Zomedica

Asset-Based$0.08

1 of 1 models see the stock below the current price.

Abbott Laboratories

DCF Models$73.01
Earnings-Based$29.42
Dividend Discount$39.73
Multiples$70.72
Asset-Based$20.05
Growth DCF$67.02
Economic Profit$37.49
Growth Earnings$70.25

26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Zomedica
Bear $0.05Fair Value $0.06Bull $0.07
$0.08 = current price (white tick)
Abbott Laboratories
Bear $51.84Fair Value $74.79Bull $94.43
$108 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Zomedica · Healthcare

Quality score44 · below median
Fair value upside-33% · below median

Abbott Laboratories · Health Care

Quality score67 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-31% · below median

Bottom line

As of Aug 11, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Abbott Laboratories as the less overvalued of the two: Zomedica trades at $0.08 versus a fair value of $0.06 (-33%), while Abbott Laboratories trades at $108 versus $74.79 (-31%).

Abbott Laboratories has the higher quality score (67/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.