0058 (0058) Fair Value & Analysis

Basic Materials · Market cap HK$123M

0 0058 0058 · HK

PriceHK$0.2390

Fair ValueHK$0.0800

Upside-66.5%

Quality47/100

Evidence: Medium Range HK$0.0500 – HK$0.1000

Fair value as of: Jul 1, 2026

From 9 valuation models · updated today

Share price −4.4% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

12‑month range HK$0.1310 – HK$0.3650 · fair‑value band HK$0.0500 – HK$0.1000 · the HK$0.2390 price screens above the HK$0.0800 fair value. As of Jul 1, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

0058 (0058) currently trades at HK$0.2390, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$0.0800 — implying the stock looks roughly 66.5% overvalued today. We read business quality at 47/100 (below-average quality), in the Basic Materials sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: medium).

Over the trailing twelve months, 0058 generated revenue of HK$205M at a net margin of -19.6%. Revenue declined 31.4% year over year. Net debt stands at HK$10.0M. Fundamentals as of Jul 1, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$205M

Revenue growth (YoY) -31.4%

Net margin -19.6%

Return on equity -104%

Free cash flow HK$4.1M FY2025

Operating margin -52.0%

More key figures

EPS (TTM) HK$-0.0500

Net debt HK$10.0M FY2025

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 1, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2021 – FY2025 · reported fiscal years

0058 reported revenue of HK$205M in FY2025 versus HK$516M in FY2021, a compound −20.6%/yr. Reported net income was −HK$40.2M in FY2025.

Revenue −20.6%/yr

FY21 HK$516M

FY22 HK$451M

FY23 HK$247M

FY24 HK$256M

FY25 HK$205M

Net income

FY21 −HK$24.7M

FY22 −HK$37.4M

FY23 −HK$45.1M

FY24 −HK$56.1M

FY25 −HK$40.2M

Is 0058 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Building Materials stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 1, 2026).

Stock	Price	Fair Value	vs Fair Value
CRH plc CRH	$99.98	$57.88	-42%
Holcim AG HCMLY	$19.20	$8.68	-55%
Heidelberg Materials AG HEI	€183.70	€168.14	-8%
Vulcan Materials Company VMC	$272.67	$117.03	-57%
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc MLM	$575.83	$135.46	-76%
UltraTech Cement Limited ULTRACEMCO	₹10,912	₹4,589	-58%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Basic Materials stocks →

All undervalued stocks Technology Financial Services Healthcare Consumer Cyclical Consumer Defensive Communication Services Industrials Energy Basic Materials Real Estate Utilities Deeply Undervalued Stocks Undervalued Blue-Chip Stocks Undervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 0058 (0058) undervalued?

As of Jul 1, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$0.0800 versus a price of HK$0.2390 — about −67% (overvalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.

What is the fair value of 0058?

Our model-based fair value for 0058 is HK$0.0800 (as of Jul 1, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$0.2390.

What is the quality score of 0058?

0058 has a Quality Score of 47/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

What is the revenue of 0058 (0058)?

0058 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$205M (latest available figure, as of Jul 1, 2026).

What is the net profit margin of 0058?

The net profit margin of 0058 is about -19.6%, meaning it is currently running at a net loss. Based on the latest reported figures.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.