Fair Value Calculator Fair Value Calculator
EN DE

0097 (0097) Fair Value & Analysis

Consumer Cyclical · Market cap HK$472M

0 0097 0097 · HK
PriceHK$0.1550
Fair ValueHK$0.7800
Upside+403.2%
Quality52/100
Evidence: Low Range HK$0.5600 – HK$1.00

Fair value as of: Jul 1, 2026

From 11 valuation models · updated today

Share price +0.6% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

HK$0.3350 HK$0.1350 Fair Value HK$0.7800 Jun 2025 Jun 2026

12‑month range HK$0.1350 – HK$0.3350 · fair‑value band HK$0.5600 – HK$1.00 · the HK$0.1550 price screens below the HK$0.7800 fair value. As of Jul 1, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

0097 (0097) currently trades at HK$0.1550, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$0.7800 — implying the stock looks roughly 403.2% undervalued today. We read business quality at 52/100 (solid quality), in the Consumer Cyclical sector. Bull case: trading below our estimate, it may offer upside if the fundamentals hold. Bear case: a low price can be a value trap when quality is weak or the data is thin (evidence: low) — always confirm before acting.

Over the trailing twelve months, 0097 generated revenue of HK$1.5B at a net margin of -4.6%. Revenue declined 6.3% year over year. It earns a return on equity of -6.5%. Net debt stands at HK$306M. Fundamentals as of Jul 1, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$1.5B
Revenue growth (YoY) -6.3%
Net margin -4.6%
Return on equity -6.5%
Free cash flow HK$185M FY2025
Operating margin -2.5%
More key figures
EPS (TTM) HK$-0.0100
EPS growth (YoY) -20.0%
Net debt HK$306M FY2025

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 1, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2021 – FY2025 · reported fiscal years

0097 reported revenue of HK$1.5B in FY2025 versus HK$1.8B in FY2021, a compound −4.6%/yr. Reported net income was −HK$67.0M in FY2025.

Revenue −4.6%/yr
FY21 HK$1.8B
FY22 HK$1.8B
FY23 HK$1.6B
FY24 HK$1.5B
FY25 HK$1.5B
Net income
FY21 HK$34.0M
FY22 −HK$5.0M
FY23 −HK$72.0M
FY24 −HK$125M
FY25 −HK$67.0M

Is 0097 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Department Stores stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 1, 2026).

Stock Price Fair Value vs Fair Value
Aeon Co AONNY $8.05 $4.68 -42%
Falabella S.A FALABELLA 5,686 CLP 8,880 CLP +56%
SM Investments Corporation SVTMF $10.15 $21.80 +115%
Ryohin Keikaku Co RYKKY $11.15 $6.53 -41%
Shoprite Holdings SRGHY $18.32 $18.67 +2%
Marks and Spencer Group MAKSY $9.54 $15.66 +64%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Consumer Cyclical stocks →

All undervalued stocks TechnologyFinancial ServicesHealthcareConsumer CyclicalConsumer DefensiveCommunication ServicesIndustrialsEnergyBasic MaterialsReal EstateUtilities Deeply Undervalued StocksUndervalued Blue-Chip StocksUndervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 0097 (0097) undervalued?
As of Jul 1, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$0.7800 versus a price of HK$0.1550 — about +403% (undervalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of 0097?
Our model-based fair value for 0097 is HK$0.7800 (as of Jul 1, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$0.1550.
What is the quality score of 0097?
0097 has a Quality Score of 52/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.
What is the revenue of 0097 (0097)?
0097 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$1.5B (latest available figure, as of Jul 1, 2026).
What is the net profit margin of 0097?
The net profit margin of 0097 is about -4.6%, meaning it is currently running at a net loss. Based on the latest reported figures.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.