Fair Value Calculator Fair Value Calculator
EN DE

1609 (1609) Fair Value & Analysis

Healthcare · Market cap HK$8.5B

1 1609 1609 · HK
PriceHK$153.10
Fair ValueHK$54.81
Upside-64.2%
Quality62/100
Watch 1609 for free — get notified when fair value or trend changes. Watch for free
Evidence: High Range HK$38.67 – HK$70.13

Fair value as of: Jul 2, 2026

From 24 valuation models · updated today

Share price −21.2% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (2 months)

HK$218.40 HK$150.00 Fair Value HK$54.81 May 2026 Jul 2026

2‑month range HK$150.00 – HK$218.40 · fair‑value band HK$38.67 – HK$70.13 · the HK$153.10 price screens above the HK$54.81 fair value. As of Jul 2, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

1609 (1609) currently trades at HK$153.10, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$54.81 — implying the stock looks roughly 64.2% overvalued today. We read business quality at 62/100 (solid quality), in the Healthcare sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: high).

Over the trailing twelve months, 1609 generated revenue of HK$403M at a net margin of 34.0%. It earns a return on equity of 25.4%. The stock trades on a trailing P/E of 53.8. Fundamentals as of Jul 2, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$403M
Net margin 34.0%
Return on equity 25.4%
Free cash flow HK$123M FY2025
P/E ratio 53.8
Operating margin 7.5%

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 2, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2022 – FY2025 · reported fiscal years

1609 reported revenue of HK$403M in FY2025 versus HK$147M in FY2022, a compound +40.1%/yr. Reported net income was HK$137M in FY2025, compounding +50.3%/yr from FY2022.

Revenue +40.1%/yr
FY22 HK$147M
FY23 HK$239M
FY24 HK$327M
FY25 HK$403M
Net income +50.3%/yr
FY22 HK$40.3M
FY23 HK$57.1M
FY24 HK$95.4M
FY25 HK$137M

Is 1609 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Medical Devices stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 2, 2026).

Stock Price Fair Value vs Fair Value
ABT ABT 1,600 MXN 1,228 MXN -23%
Abbott Laboratories, ABTT34 R$38.22 R$30.39 -20%
Stryker Corporation S1YK34 R$77.83 R$8.47 -89%
Medtronic plc MDT $80.25 $74.40 -7%
Boston Scientific Corporation B1SX34 R$248.75 R$221.81 -11%
Edwards Lifesciences Corporation EW $85.88 $41.02 -52%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Healthcare stocks →

All undervalued stocks TechnologyFinancial ServicesHealthcareConsumer CyclicalConsumer DefensiveCommunication ServicesIndustrialsEnergyBasic MaterialsReal EstateUtilities Deeply Undervalued StocksUndervalued Blue-Chip StocksUndervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 1609 (1609) undervalued?
As of Jul 2, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$54.81 versus a price of HK$153.10 — about −64% (overvalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of 1609?
Our model-based fair value for 1609 is HK$54.81 (as of Jul 2, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$153.10.
What is the quality score of 1609?
1609 has a Quality Score of 62/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.
What is the revenue of 1609 (1609)?
1609 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$403M (latest available figure, as of Jul 2, 2026).
What is the net profit margin of 1609?
The net profit margin of 1609 is about 34.0%, meaning it keeps roughly 34.0% of revenue as net income. Based on the latest reported figures.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.