1723 (1723) Fair Value & Analysis

Communication Services · Market cap HK$421M

1 1723 1723 · HK

PriceHK$0.8700

Fair ValueHK$0.1300

Upside-85.1%

Quality42/100

Watch 1723 for free — get notified when fair value or trend changes. Watch for free

Evidence: High Range HK$0.1100 – HK$0.1300

Fair value as of: Jul 2, 2026

From 23 valuation models · updated today

Share price −7.4% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

12‑month range HK$0.8700 – HK$4.30 · fair‑value band HK$0.1100 – HK$0.1300 · the HK$0.8700 price screens above the HK$0.1300 fair value. As of Jul 2, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

1723 (1723) currently trades at HK$0.8700, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$0.1300 — implying the stock looks roughly 85.1% overvalued today. We read business quality at 42/100 (below-average quality), in the Communication Services sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: high).

Over the trailing twelve months, 1723 generated revenue of HK$197M at a net margin of -99.0%. Revenue grew 7.6% year over year. It earns a return on equity of -73.2%. The balance sheet holds a net cash position of HK$42.8M. Fundamentals as of Jul 2, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$197M

Revenue growth (YoY) +7.6%

Net margin -99.0%

Return on equity -73.2%

Free cash flow HK$4.1M FY2025

Operating margin -5.4%

More key figures

EPS (TTM) HK$-0.4300

EPS growth (YoY) -72.5%

Net cash HK$42.8M FY2025

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 2, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2021 – FY2025 · reported fiscal years

1723 reported revenue of HK$190M in FY2025 versus HK$136M in FY2021, a compound +8.7%/yr. Reported net income was HK$1.8M in FY2025, compounding −36.1%/yr from FY2021.

Revenue +8.7%/yr

FY21 HK$136M

FY22 HK$183M

FY23 HK$205M

FY24 HK$252M

FY25 HK$190M

Net income −36.1%/yr

FY21 HK$10.8M

FY22 HK$19.5M

FY23 HK$3.9M

FY24 HK$14.8M

FY25 HK$1.8M

Is 1723 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Telecom Services stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 2, 2026).

Stock	Price	Fair Value	vs Fair Value
China Mobile Limited 600941	¥97.27	¥68.44	-30%
SoftBank Group SFTBF	$41.03	$68.21	+66%
T-Mobile US, Inc TM5	€158.74	€267.43	+68%
Verizon Communications Inc BAC	€40.66	€48.01	+18%
VZ VZ	797.00 MXN	57.23 MXN	-93%
AT&T Inc SOBA	€20.05	€29.14	+45%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Communication Services stocks →

All undervalued stocks Technology Financial Services Healthcare Consumer Cyclical Consumer Defensive Communication Services Industrials Energy Basic Materials Real Estate Utilities Deeply Undervalued Stocks Undervalued Blue-Chip Stocks Undervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 1723 (1723) undervalued?

As of Jul 2, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$0.1300 versus a price of HK$0.8700 — about −85% (overvalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.

What is the fair value of 1723?

Our model-based fair value for 1723 is HK$0.1300 (as of Jul 2, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$0.8700.

What is the quality score of 1723?

1723 has a Quality Score of 42/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

What is the revenue of 1723 (1723)?

1723 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$197M (latest available figure, as of Jul 2, 2026).

What is the net profit margin of 1723?

The net profit margin of 1723 is about -99.0%, meaning it is currently running at a net loss. Based on the latest reported figures.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.