Fair Value Calculator Fair Value Calculator
EN DE

1742 (1742) Fair Value & Analysis

Industrials · Market cap HK$282M

1 1742 1742 · HK
PriceHK$0.1680
Fair ValueHK$0.1573
Upside-6.4%
Quality74/100
Watch 1742 for free — get notified when fair value or trend changes. Watch for free
Evidence: Medium Range HK$0.1178 – HK$0.1960

Fair value as of: Jul 2, 2026

From 24 valuation models · updated today

Share price −10.6% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

HK$0.2550 HK$0.0690 Fair Value HK$0.1573 Jun 2025 Jul 2026

12‑month range HK$0.0690 – HK$0.2550 · fair‑value band HK$0.1178 – HK$0.1960 · the HK$0.1680 price screens above the HK$0.1573 fair value. As of Jul 2, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

1742 (1742) currently trades at HK$0.1680, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$0.1573 — implying the stock looks roughly 6.4% overvalued today. We read business quality at 74/100 (solid quality), in the Industrials sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: medium).

Over the trailing twelve months, 1742 generated revenue of HK$283M at a net margin of 12.7%. Revenue grew 99.7% year over year. It earns a return on equity of 35.3%. The balance sheet holds a net cash position of HK$66.1M. Fundamentals as of Jul 2, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$283M
Revenue growth (YoY) +99.7%
Net margin 12.7%
Return on equity 35.3%
Free cash flow HK$37.0M FY2025
P/E ratio 1.3
More key figures
Operating margin 3.3%
EPS growth (YoY) +4,800%
Net cash HK$66.1M FY2025

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 2, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2021 – FY2025 · reported fiscal years

1742 reported revenue of HK$281M in FY2025 versus HK$189M in FY2021, a compound +10.5%/yr. Reported net income was HK$35.7M in FY2025.

Revenue +10.5%/yr
FY21 HK$189M
FY22 HK$203M
FY23 HK$289M
FY24 HK$170M
FY25 HK$281M
Net income
FY21 −HK$4.7M
FY22 −HK$166K
FY23 HK$3.4M
FY24 −HK$8.5M
FY25 HK$35.7M

Is 1742 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Engineering & Construction stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 2, 2026).

Stock Price Fair Value vs Fair Value
Larsen & Toubro Limited LTOD $0.4110 $0.0100 -98%
Samsung C&T Corporation 028260 407,500 KRW 236,704 KRW -42%
China State Construction Engineering Corporation 601668 ¥4.74 ¥15.02 +217%
TopBuild Corp BLD 7,547 MXN 3,472 MXN -54%
000720 000720 130,300 KRW 55,602 KRW -57%
United Integrated Services Co 2404 1,205 TWD 1,891 TWD +57%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Industrials stocks →

All undervalued stocks TechnologyFinancial ServicesHealthcareConsumer CyclicalConsumer DefensiveCommunication ServicesIndustrialsEnergyBasic MaterialsReal EstateUtilities Deeply Undervalued StocksUndervalued Blue-Chip StocksUndervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 1742 (1742) undervalued?
As of Jul 2, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$0.1573 versus a price of HK$0.1680 — about −6% (overvalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of 1742?
Our model-based fair value for 1742 is HK$0.1573 (as of Jul 2, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$0.1680.
What is the quality score of 1742?
1742 has a Quality Score of 74/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.
What is the revenue of 1742 (1742)?
1742 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$283M (latest available figure, as of Jul 2, 2026).
What is the net profit margin of 1742?
The net profit margin of 1742 is about 12.7%, meaning it keeps roughly 12.7% of revenue as net income. Based on the latest reported figures.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.