1795 (1795) Fair Value & Analysis

Consumer Cyclical · Market cap HK$294M

1 1795 1795 · HK

PriceHK$0.4900

Fair ValueHK$1.24

Upside+153.1%

Quality37/100

Watch 1795 for free — get notified when fair value or trend changes. Watch for free

Evidence: High Range HK$0.8800 – HK$1.55

Fair value as of: Jul 2, 2026

From 15 valuation models · updated today

Share price −12.5% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

12‑month range HK$0.4750 – HK$0.8900 · fair‑value band HK$0.8800 – HK$1.55 · the HK$0.4900 price screens below the HK$1.24 fair value. As of Jul 2, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

1795 (1795) currently trades at HK$0.4900, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$1.24 — implying the stock looks roughly 153.1% undervalued today. We read business quality at 37/100 (below-average quality), in the Consumer Cyclical sector. Bull case: trading below our estimate, it may offer upside if the fundamentals hold. Bear case: a low price can be a value trap when quality is weak or the data is thin (evidence: high) — always confirm before acting.

Over the trailing twelve months, 1795 generated revenue of HK$1.1B at a net margin of 3.5%. Revenue declined 2.2% year over year. It earns a return on equity of 11.1%. Net debt stands at HK$308M. Fundamentals as of Jul 2, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$1.1B

Revenue growth (YoY) -2.2%

Net margin 3.5%

Return on equity 11.1%

Free cash flow −HK$75.6M FY2025

P/E ratio 7.0

More key figures

Operating margin 3.9%

EPS (TTM) HK$0.0300

EPS growth (YoY) -5.8%

Net debt HK$308M FY2025

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 2, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2021 – FY2025 · reported fiscal years

1795 reported revenue of HK$1.1B in FY2025 versus HK$814M in FY2021, a compound +7.2%/yr. Reported net income was HK$37.9M in FY2025, compounding +1.9%/yr from FY2021.

Revenue +7.2%/yr

FY21 HK$814M

FY22 HK$1.1B

FY23 HK$1.1B

FY24 HK$1.1B

FY25 HK$1.1B

Net income +1.9%/yr

FY21 HK$35.2M

FY22 HK$49.9M

FY23 HK$34.5M

FY24 HK$37.0M

FY25 HK$37.9M

Is 1795 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Textile Manufacturing stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 2, 2026).

Stock	Price	Fair Value	vs Fair Value
Toray Industries, Inc TRYIF	$7.90	$6.29	-20%
Shenzhou International Group SZHIF	$6.78	$9.47	+40%
Tongkun Group 601233	¥23.09	¥14.53	-37%
HMT (Xiamen) New Technical Materials Co 603306	¥110.20	¥13.36	-88%
Far Eastern New Century Corporation 1402	27.55 TWD	28.72 TWD	+4%
KPRMILL KPRMILL	₹1,181	₹467.49	-60%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Consumer Cyclical stocks →

All undervalued stocks Technology Financial Services Healthcare Consumer Cyclical Consumer Defensive Communication Services Industrials Energy Basic Materials Real Estate Utilities Deeply Undervalued Stocks Undervalued Blue-Chip Stocks Undervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 1795 (1795) undervalued?

As of Jul 2, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$1.24 versus a price of HK$0.4900 — about +153% (undervalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.

What is the fair value of 1795?

Our model-based fair value for 1795 is HK$1.24 (as of Jul 2, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$0.4900.

What is the quality score of 1795?

1795 has a Quality Score of 37/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

What is the revenue of 1795 (1795)?

1795 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$1.1B (latest available figure, as of Jul 2, 2026).

What is the net profit margin of 1795?

The net profit margin of 1795 is about 3.5%, meaning it keeps roughly 3.5% of revenue as net income. Based on the latest reported figures.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.