1899 (1899) Fair Value & Analysis

Consumer Cyclical · Market cap HK$2.2B

1 1899 1899 · HK

PriceHK$1.15

Fair ValueHK$3.48

Upside+202.6%

Quality52/100

Watch 1899 for free — get notified when fair value or trend changes. Watch for free

Evidence: Medium Range HK$2.61 – HK$4.35

Fair value as of: Jul 2, 2026

From 26 valuation models · updated today

Share price −4.2% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

12‑month range HK$0.9596 – HK$1.35 · fair‑value band HK$2.61 – HK$4.35 · the HK$1.15 price screens below the HK$3.48 fair value. As of Jul 2, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

1899 (1899) currently trades at HK$1.15, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$3.48 — implying the stock looks roughly 202.6% undervalued today. We read business quality at 52/100 (solid quality), in the Consumer Cyclical sector. Bull case: trading below our estimate, it may offer upside if the fundamentals hold. Bear case: a low price can be a value trap when quality is weak or the data is thin (evidence: medium) — always confirm before acting.

Over the trailing twelve months, 1899 generated revenue of HK$11.5B at a net margin of 3.0%. Revenue grew 0.7% year over year. It earns a return on equity of 5.4%. Net debt stands at HK$6.8B. Fundamentals as of Jul 2, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$11.5B

Revenue growth (YoY) +0.7%

Net margin 3.0%

Return on equity 5.4%

Free cash flow HK$633M FY2025

P/E ratio 5.7

More key figures

Operating margin 3.6%

EPS (TTM) HK$0.1000

EPS growth (YoY) +83.9%

Net debt HK$6.8B FY2025

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 2, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2021 – FY2025 · reported fiscal years

1899 reported revenue of HK$11.5B in FY2025 versus HK$10.6B in FY2021, a compound +1.9%/yr. Reported net income was HK$340M in FY2025, compounding +11.7%/yr from FY2021.

Revenue +1.9%/yr

FY21 HK$10.6B

FY22 HK$10.8B

FY23 HK$11.5B

FY24 HK$11.9B

FY25 HK$11.5B

Net income +11.7%/yr

FY21 HK$219M

FY22 HK$348M

FY23 HK$449M

FY24 HK$269M

FY25 HK$340M

Is 1899 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Auto Parts stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 2, 2026).

Stock	Price	Fair Value	vs Fair Value
O'Reilly Automotive, Inc ORLY34	R$1.51	R$0.7200	-52%
AutoZone, Inc AZOI34	R$70.97	R$37.57	-47%
Hyundai Mobis Co 012330	569,000 KRW	687,665 KRW	+21%
Fuyao Glass Industry Group 600660	¥50.05	¥111.37	+123%
Magna International Inc MGAN	1,182 MXN	1,064 MXN	-10%
Ningbo Tuopu Group 601689	¥63.21	¥19.12	-70%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Consumer Cyclical stocks →

All undervalued stocks Technology Financial Services Healthcare Consumer Cyclical Consumer Defensive Communication Services Industrials Energy Basic Materials Real Estate Utilities Deeply Undervalued Stocks Undervalued Blue-Chip Stocks Undervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 1899 (1899) undervalued?

As of Jul 2, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$3.48 versus a price of HK$1.15 — about +203% (undervalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.

What is the fair value of 1899?

Our model-based fair value for 1899 is HK$3.48 (as of Jul 2, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$1.15.

What is the quality score of 1899?

1899 has a Quality Score of 52/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

What is the revenue of 1899 (1899)?

1899 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$11.5B (latest available figure, as of Jul 2, 2026).

What is the net profit margin of 1899?

The net profit margin of 1899 is about 3.0%, meaning it keeps roughly 3.0% of revenue as net income. Based on the latest reported figures.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.