Fair Value Calculator Fair Value Calculator
EN DE

2002 (2002) Fair Value & Analysis

Basic Materials · Market cap HK$863M

2 2002 2002 · HK
PriceHK$0.7900
Fair ValueHK$2.95
Upside+273.4%
Quality37/100
Watch 2002 for free — get notified when fair value or trend changes. Watch for free
Evidence: Medium Range HK$2.21 – HK$3.15

Fair value as of: Jul 2, 2026

From 16 valuation models · updated today

Share price −22.5% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

HK$2.06 HK$0.7900 Fair Value HK$2.95 Jun 2025 Jul 2026

12‑month range HK$0.7900 – HK$2.06 · fair‑value band HK$2.21 – HK$3.15 · the HK$0.7900 price screens below the HK$2.95 fair value. As of Jul 2, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

2002 (2002) currently trades at HK$0.7900, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$2.95 — implying the stock looks roughly 273.4% undervalued today. We read business quality at 37/100 (below-average quality), in the Basic Materials sector. Bull case: trading below our estimate, it may offer upside if the fundamentals hold. Bear case: a low price can be a value trap when quality is weak or the data is thin (evidence: medium) — always confirm before acting.

Over the trailing twelve months, 2002 generated revenue of HK$7.8B at a net margin of 2.1%. Revenue grew 3.1% year over year. It earns a return on equity of 3.7%. Net debt stands at HK$3.6B. Fundamentals as of Jul 2, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$7.8B
Revenue growth (YoY) +3.1%
Net margin 2.1%
Return on equity 3.7%
Free cash flow −HK$582M FY2025
P/E ratio 4.8
More key figures
Operating margin 2.4%
EPS (TTM) HK$0.0800
EPS growth (YoY) -15.2%
Net debt HK$3.6B FY2025

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 2, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2021 – FY2025 · reported fiscal years

2002 reported revenue of HK$7.8B in FY2025 versus HK$8.0B in FY2021, a compound −0.6%/yr. Reported net income was HK$160M in FY2025, compounding −26.8%/yr from FY2021.

Revenue −0.6%/yr
FY21 HK$8.0B
FY22 HK$9.5B
FY23 HK$8.4B
FY24 HK$8.0B
FY25 HK$7.8B
Net income −26.8%/yr
FY21 HK$557M
FY22 HK$206M
FY23 HK$393M
FY24 HK$280M
FY25 HK$160M

Is 2002 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Paper & Paper Products stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 2, 2026).

Stock Price Fair Value vs Fair Value
Klabin S.A KLBN11 R$17.05 R$12.20 -28%
UPM-Kymmene Oyj UPMKF $29.33 $17.60 -40%
Suzano S.A SUZ $8.04 $24.29 +202%
Svenska Cellulosa Aktiebolaget SCA (publ) SCAB kr 100.35 kr 28.26 -72%
Shandong Sunpaper Co 002078 ¥13.24 ¥9.88 -25%
Holmen AB HLMMF $35.72 $32.71 -8%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Basic Materials stocks →

All undervalued stocks TechnologyFinancial ServicesHealthcareConsumer CyclicalConsumer DefensiveCommunication ServicesIndustrialsEnergyBasic MaterialsReal EstateUtilities Deeply Undervalued StocksUndervalued Blue-Chip StocksUndervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 2002 (2002) undervalued?
As of Jul 2, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$2.95 versus a price of HK$0.7900 — about +273% (undervalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of 2002?
Our model-based fair value for 2002 is HK$2.95 (as of Jul 2, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$0.7900.
What is the quality score of 2002?
2002 has a Quality Score of 37/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.
What is the revenue of 2002 (2002)?
2002 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$7.8B (latest available figure, as of Jul 2, 2026).
What is the net profit margin of 2002?
The net profit margin of 2002 is about 2.1%, meaning it keeps roughly 2.1% of revenue as net income. Based on the latest reported figures.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.