2009 (2009) Fair Value & Analysis

Basic Materials · Market cap HK$6.0B

2 2009 2009 · HK

PriceHK$0.5600

Fair ValueHK$1.20

Upside+114.3%

Quality43/100

Watch 2009 for free — get notified when fair value or trend changes. Watch for free

Evidence: Low Range HK$0.5500 – HK$2.04

Fair value as of: Jul 2, 2026

From 4 valuation models · updated today

Share price −14.1% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

12‑month range HK$0.5400 – HK$0.8353 · fair‑value band HK$0.5500 – HK$2.04 · the HK$0.5600 price screens below the HK$1.20 fair value. As of Jul 2, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

2009 (2009) currently trades at HK$0.5600, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$1.20 — implying the stock looks roughly 114.3% undervalued today. We read business quality at 43/100 (below-average quality), in the Basic Materials sector. Bull case: trading below our estimate, it may offer upside if the fundamentals hold. Bear case: a low price can be a value trap when quality is weak or the data is thin (evidence: low) — always confirm before acting.

Over the trailing twelve months, 2009 generated revenue of HK$89.6B at a net margin of -1.6%. Revenue declined 9.2% year over year. It earns a return on equity of -1.8%. Net debt stands at HK$142B. Fundamentals as of Jul 2, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$89.6B

Revenue growth (YoY) -9.2%

Net margin -1.6%

Return on equity -1.8%

Free cash flow −HK$1.2B FY2025

Operating margin -11.4%

More key figures

EPS (TTM) HK$0.3099

Dividend yield 9.1%

EPS growth (YoY) -40.2%

Net debt HK$142B FY2025

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 2, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2021 – FY2025 · reported fiscal years

2009 reported revenue of HK$91.1B in FY2025 versus HK$124B in FY2021, a compound −7.3%/yr. Reported net income was −HK$1.0B in FY2025.

Revenue −7.3%/yr

FY21 HK$124B

FY22 HK$103B

FY23 HK$107B

FY24 HK$111B

FY25 HK$91.1B

Net income

FY21 HK$2.9B

FY22 HK$1.2B

FY23 HK$25.3M

FY24 −HK$555M

FY25 −HK$1.0B

Is 2009 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Building Materials stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 2, 2026).

Stock	Price	Fair Value	vs Fair Value
CRH plc CRH	$99.98	$57.88	-42%
Holcim AG HCMLY	$18.69	$9.04	-52%
Heidelberg Materials AG HEI	€172.00	€136.22	-21%
Vulcan Materials Company VMC	$272.67	$117.03	-57%
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc MLM	$604.18	$218.79	-64%
UltraTech Cement Limited ULTRACEMCO	₹10,912	₹4,589	-58%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Basic Materials stocks →

All undervalued stocks Technology Financial Services Healthcare Consumer Cyclical Consumer Defensive Communication Services Industrials Energy Basic Materials Real Estate Utilities Deeply Undervalued Stocks Undervalued Blue-Chip Stocks Undervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 2009 (2009) undervalued?

As of Jul 2, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$1.20 versus a price of HK$0.5600 — about +114% (undervalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.

What is the fair value of 2009?

Our model-based fair value for 2009 is HK$1.20 (as of Jul 2, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$0.5600.

What is the quality score of 2009?

2009 has a Quality Score of 43/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

What is the revenue of 2009 (2009)?

2009 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$89.6B (latest available figure, as of Jul 2, 2026).

What is the net profit margin of 2009?

The net profit margin of 2009 is about -1.6%, meaning it is currently running at a net loss. Based on the latest reported figures.

Does 2009 pay a dividend?

2009 currently shows a dividend yield of about 9.09% relative to its recent price (as of Jul 2, 2026).

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.