2030 (2030) Fair Value & Analysis

Consumer Cyclical · Market cap HK$856M

2 2030 2030 · HK

PriceHK$1.28

Fair ValueHK$1.16

Upside-9.4%

Quality47/100

Watch 2030 for free — get notified when fair value or trend changes. Watch for free

Evidence: High Range HK$0.8700 – HK$1.16

Fair value as of: Jul 2, 2026

From 15 valuation models · updated today

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

12‑month range HK$1.25 – HK$1.60 · fair‑value band HK$0.8700 – HK$1.16 · the HK$1.28 price screens above the HK$1.16 fair value. As of Jul 2, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

2030 (2030) currently trades at HK$1.28, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$1.16 — implying the stock looks roughly 9.4% overvalued today. We read business quality at 47/100 (below-average quality), in the Consumer Cyclical sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: high).

Over the trailing twelve months, 2030 generated revenue of HK$944M at a net margin of 3.2%. Revenue declined 1.5% year over year. It earns a return on equity of 2.4%. Net debt stands at HK$115M. Fundamentals as of Jul 2, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$944M

Revenue growth (YoY) -1.5%

Net margin 3.2%

Return on equity 2.4%

Free cash flow −HK$13.2M FY2025

P/E ratio 25.6

More key figures

Operating margin 7.3%

EPS (TTM) HK$0.0200

Dividend yield 1.4%

EPS growth (YoY) +7.1%

Net debt HK$115M FY2025

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 2, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2021 – FY2025 · reported fiscal years

2030 reported revenue of HK$944M in FY2025 versus HK$1.4B in FY2021, a compound −8.9%/yr. Reported net income was HK$30.6M in FY2025, compounding −34.3%/yr from FY2021.

Revenue −8.9%/yr

FY21 HK$1.4B

FY22 HK$1.2B

FY23 HK$1.2B

FY24 HK$1.0B

FY25 HK$944M

Net income −34.3%/yr

FY21 HK$164M

FY22 −HK$85.1M

FY23 HK$20.8M

FY24 HK$27.4M

FY25 HK$30.6M

Is 2030 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Apparel Manufacturing stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 2, 2026).

Stock	Price	Fair Value	vs Fair Value
H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB HNNMY	$3.58	$3.95	+10%
Ralph Lauren Corporation RL	$366.55	$365.78	-0%
Moncler S.p.A MONC	€53.84	€38.28	-29%
Gildan Activewear Inc GIL	$52.09	$33.02	-37%
LPP SA LPP	21,720 PLN	18,670 PLN	-14%
Levi Strauss & Co LEVI	$22.53	$56.56	+151%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Consumer Cyclical stocks →

All undervalued stocks Technology Financial Services Healthcare Consumer Cyclical Consumer Defensive Communication Services Industrials Energy Basic Materials Real Estate Utilities Deeply Undervalued Stocks Undervalued Blue-Chip Stocks Undervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 2030 (2030) undervalued?

As of Jul 2, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$1.16 versus a price of HK$1.28 — about −9% (overvalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.

What is the fair value of 2030?

Our model-based fair value for 2030 is HK$1.16 (as of Jul 2, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$1.28.

What is the quality score of 2030?

2030 has a Quality Score of 47/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

What is the revenue of 2030 (2030)?

2030 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$944M (latest available figure, as of Jul 2, 2026).

What is the net profit margin of 2030?

The net profit margin of 2030 is about 3.2%, meaning it keeps roughly 3.2% of revenue as net income. Based on the latest reported figures.

Does 2030 pay a dividend?

2030 currently shows a dividend yield of about 1.36% relative to its recent price (as of Jul 2, 2026).

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.