2227 (2227) Fair Value & Analysis

Industrials · Market cap HK$261M

2 2227 2227 · HK

PriceHK$0.2900

Fair ValueHK$0.6500

Upside+124.1%

Quality63/100

Watch 2227 for free — get notified when fair value or trend changes. Watch for free

Evidence: High Range HK$0.5300 – HK$1.09

Fair value as of: Jul 2, 2026

From 16 valuation models · updated today

Share price −1.7% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

12‑month range HK$0.0930 – HK$0.3450 · fair‑value band HK$0.5300 – HK$1.09 · the HK$0.2900 price screens below the HK$0.6500 fair value. As of Jul 2, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

2227 (2227) currently trades at HK$0.2900, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$0.6500 — implying the stock looks roughly 124.1% undervalued today. We read business quality at 63/100 (solid quality), in the Industrials sector. Bull case: trading below our estimate, it may offer upside if the fundamentals hold. Bear case: a low price can be a value trap when quality is weak or the data is thin (evidence: high) — always confirm before acting.

Over the trailing twelve months, 2227 generated revenue of HK$18.5M at a net margin of 64.6%. Revenue declined 30.7% year over year. It earns a return on equity of 19.4%. The balance sheet holds a net cash position of HK$16.0M. Fundamentals as of Jul 2, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$18.5M

Revenue growth (YoY) -30.7%

Net margin 64.6%

Return on equity 19.4%

Free cash flow HK$3.1M FY2025

P/E ratio 3.6

More key figures

Operating margin -23.5%

EPS growth (YoY) +705%

Net cash HK$16.0M FY2025

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 2, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2021 – FY2025 · reported fiscal years

2227 reported revenue of HK$18.2M in FY2025 versus HK$14.6M in FY2021, a compound +5.6%/yr. Reported net income was HK$11.8M in FY2025.

Revenue +5.6%/yr

FY21 HK$14.6M

FY22 HK$13.7M

FY23 HK$18.8M

FY24 HK$19.9M

FY25 HK$18.2M

Net income

FY21 −HK$4.0M

FY22 −HK$911K

FY23 −HK$6.0K

FY24 HK$811K

FY25 HK$11.8M

Is 2227 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Engineering & Construction stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 2, 2026).

Stock	Price	Fair Value	vs Fair Value
Larsen & Toubro Limited LTOD	$0.4110	$0.0100	-98%
Samsung C&T Corporation 028260	520,000 KRW	268,469 KRW	-48%
China State Construction Engineering Corporation 601668	¥4.65	¥17.35	+273%
TopBuild Corp BLD	7,547 MXN	324.01 MXN	-96%
000720 000720	130,300 KRW	55,602 KRW	-57%
United Integrated Services Co 2404	1,205 TWD	1,891 TWD	+57%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Industrials stocks →

All undervalued stocks Technology Financial Services Healthcare Consumer Cyclical Consumer Defensive Communication Services Industrials Energy Basic Materials Real Estate Utilities Deeply Undervalued Stocks Undervalued Blue-Chip Stocks Undervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 2227 (2227) undervalued?

As of Jul 2, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$0.6500 versus a price of HK$0.2900 — about +124% (undervalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.

What is the fair value of 2227?

Our model-based fair value for 2227 is HK$0.6500 (as of Jul 2, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$0.2900.

What is the quality score of 2227?

2227 has a Quality Score of 63/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

What is the revenue of 2227 (2227)?

2227 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$18.5M (latest available figure, as of Jul 2, 2026).

What is the net profit margin of 2227?

The net profit margin of 2227 is about 64.6%, meaning it keeps roughly 64.6% of revenue as net income. Based on the latest reported figures.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.