Fairvalue-Calculator Fairvalue-Calculator
EN DE

Mega Uranium Ltd (MGA) Fair Value & Analysis

Energy · CA · Market cap C$223M

MU Mega Uranium Ltd MGA · TO
PriceC$0.6100
Fair ValueC$1.13
Upside+85.2%
Quality95/100
Evidence: Low Range C$0.8500 – C$1.41

Fair value as of: Jun 24, 2026

From 2 valuation models · updated 5 days ago

Share price −19.1% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

C$0.8762 C$0.2995 Fair Value C$1.13 Jun 2025 Jun 2026

12‑month range C$0.2995 – C$0.8762 · fair‑value band C$0.8500 – C$1.41 · the C$0.6100 price screens below the C$1.13 fair value. As of Jun 24, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

Mega Uranium Ltd (MGA) currently trades at C$0.6100, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is C$1.13 — implying the stock looks roughly 85.2% undervalued today. We read business quality at 95/100 (high quality), in the Energy sector. Bull case: trading below our estimate, it may offer upside if the fundamentals hold. Bear case: a low price can be a value trap when quality is weak or the data is thin (evidence: low) — always confirm before acting.

It earns a return on equity of 3.9%. Net debt stands at C$18.0M. The stock trades on a trailing P/E of 29.0. Fundamentals as of Jun 24, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Return on equity 3.9%
Free cash flow −C$2.6M FY2025
P/E ratio 29.0
EPS (TTM) C$0.0200
EPS growth (YoY) +151%
Net debt C$18.0M FY2025

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jun 24, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

About the company

Mega Uranium Ltd., a uranium mining and investment company, explores for uranium properties primarily in Canada and Australia. It explores for uranium and gold. The company holds interest in the Georgetown project located in Queensland, Australia; and Redport project situated in Western Australia. The company was formerly known as Maple Minerals Corp. and changed its name to Mega Uranium Ltd. in October 2005. Mega Uranium Ltd. was incorporated in 1990 and is headquartered in Toronto, Canada.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2021 – FY2025 · reported fiscal years

Mega Uranium Ltd reported revenue of C$0 in FY2025 versus C$0 in FY2021. Reported net income was −C$4.6M in FY2025.

Revenue
FY21 C$0
FY22 C$0
FY23 C$0
FY24 C$0
FY25 C$0
Net income
FY21 C$20.9M
FY22 −C$8.4M
FY23 C$4.4M
FY24 −C$6.1M
FY25 −C$4.6M

Open the full interactive analysis →

Similar stocks

6 more Uranium stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jun 24, 2026).

Stock Price Fair Value vs Fair Value
National Atomic Company KAP $73.30 $50.43 -31%
Cameco Corporation CCJ $120.51 $10.69 -91%
China National Uranium Co 001280 ¥74.25 ¥11.54 -84%
NexGen Energy Ltd NXE $10.45 $4.98 -52%
NexgenRx Inc NXG A$14.63 A$4.99 -66%
Uranium Energy Corp UEC $9.42 $0.2200 -98%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Energy stocks →

All undervalued stocks TechnologyFinancial ServicesHealthcareConsumer CyclicalConsumer DefensiveCommunication ServicesIndustrialsEnergyBasic MaterialsReal EstateUtilities Deeply Undervalued StocksUndervalued Blue-Chip StocksUndervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is Mega Uranium Ltd (MGA) undervalued?
As of Jun 24, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of C$1.13 versus a price of C$0.6100 — about +85% (undervalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of MGA?
Our 21-model fair value for Mega Uranium Ltd is C$1.13 (as of Jun 24, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is C$0.6100.
What is the quality score of MGA?
Mega Uranium Ltd has a Quality Score of 95/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.
What is the net profit margin of MGA?
The net profit margin of Mega Uranium Ltd is about 0.0%, meaning it keeps roughly 0.0% of revenue as net income. Based on the latest reported figures.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.