Fairvalue-Calculator Fairvalue-Calculator
EN DE

Source Energy Services Ltd (SCEYF) Fair Value & Analysis

Energy · US · Market cap $128M

Price$9.73
Fair Value$24.89
Upside+155.8%
Quality95/100
Evidence: High Range $15.89 – $31.11

Fair value as of: Jun 25, 2026

✦ Find undervalued quality stocks — 34,000+ analysed Find stocks →

Analysis

Source Energy Services Ltd (SCEYF) currently trades at $9.73, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is $24.89 — implying the stock looks roughly 155.8% undervalued today. We read business quality at 95/100 (high quality), in the Energy sector. Bull case: trading below our estimate, it may offer upside if the fundamentals hold. Bear case: a low price can be a value trap when quality is weak or the data is thin (evidence: high) — always confirm before acting.

About the company

Source Energy Services Ltd., together with its subsidiaries, engages in the production and distribution of frac sand used primarily in oil and gas exploration and production in Canada and the United States. It also provides logistics services, including trucking operations; and Sahara, a well-site mobile sand storage and handling system, as well as distributes bulk completion materials. The company was founded in 1998 and is headquartered in Calgary, Canada.

Open the full interactive analysis →

Similar stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is Source Energy Services Ltd (SCEYF) undervalued?
As of Jun 25, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of $24.89 versus a price of $9.73 — about +156% (undervalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of SCEYF?
Our 21-model fair value for Source Energy Services Ltd is $24.89 (as of Jun 25, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is $9.73.
What is the quality score of SCEYF?
Source Energy Services Ltd has a Quality Score of 95/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.