EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

China Tianying vs Waste Management: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how China Tianying (000035) and Waste Management (WM) compare, as of Aug 10, 2026.

As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees China Tianying as the less overvalued of the two: China Tianying trades at ¥4.82 versus a fair value of ¥3.28 (-32%), while Waste Management trades at $228 versus $128 (-44%).
China Tianying
000035.SHE · CNY · Industrials
-32%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price¥4.82
Fair Value¥3.28
Quality40/100
Waste Management
WM · USD · Industrials
-44%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$228
Fair Value$128
Quality56/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

China TianyingWaste Management
Valuation
38.5×P/E (TTM)33.8×
2.29×P/S (TTM)3.69×
1.10×P/B9.38×
8.6×EV/EBITDA15.1×
PEG2.38×
0.7%Dividend yield1.5%
¥0.04Dividend per share$3.42
Profitability
6%Net margin11%
26%Operating margin18%
3%Return on equity30%
2%Return on assets7%
Growth
-5%Revenue growth (YoY)4%
-7.6%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)8.6%
-24.7%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)10.6%
Balance & size
0.57×Debt / equity2.22×
$2BMarket cap$94B
weakGrowth qualityhealthy

Waste Management leads: 5 to 8 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

China Tianyingof which business quality 38 · market factors 40 Waste Managementof which business quality 54 · market factors 60
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
17
50
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
46
56
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
37
64
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
26
34
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
52
35
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
68
94
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
28
44
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
31
50
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
70
85

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

China Tianying

Earnings-Based¥4.16
Multiples¥2.33
Asset-Based¥3.06
Economic Profit¥2.53
Growth Earnings¥5.44

10 of 14 models see the stock below the current price.

Waste Management

DCF Models$108
Earnings-Based$80.38
Multiples$127
Asset-Based$16.67
Growth DCF$95.15
Economic Profit$71.06
Growth Earnings$128

24 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Waste Management
Bear $51.16Fair Value $128Bull $177
$228 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

China Tianying · Industrials

Quality score40 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside-32% · below median

Waste Management · Industrials

Quality score56 · above median
Fair value upside-44% · below median

Bottom line

As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees China Tianying as the less overvalued of the two: China Tianying trades at ¥4.82 versus a fair value of ¥3.28 (-32%), while Waste Management trades at $228 versus $128 (-44%).

Waste Management has the higher quality score (56/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.