EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Zhejiang Bofay Elec Co vs Linde: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Zhejiang Bofay Elec Co (001255) and Linde (LIN) compare, as of Aug 12, 2026.

As of Aug 12, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Linde as the less overvalued of the two: Zhejiang Bofay Elec Co trades at ¥25.31 versus a fair value of ¥3.00 (-88%), while Linde trades at $491 versus $222 (-55%).
Zhejiang Bofay Elec Co
001255.SHE · CNY · Materials
-88%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price¥25.31
Fair Value¥3.00
Quality34/100
Linde
LIN · USD · Materials
-55%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$491
Fair Value$222
Quality70/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Zhejiang Bofay Elec CoLinde
Valuation
224.9×P/E (TTM)34.1×
5.29×P/S (TTM)6.95×
2.85×P/B6.30×
60.0×EV/EBITDA18.9×
PEG2.18×
Dividend yield1.2%
Dividend per share$6.10
Profitability
2%Net margin20%
-2%Operating margin28%
1%Return on equity18%
-0%Return on assets7%
Growth
37%Revenue growth (YoY)8%
8.1%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)0.6%
6.5%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)4.5%
Balance & size
0.03×Debt / equity0.54×
$377MMarket cap$241B
expensiveGrowth qualityhealthy

Even match: 6 to 6 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Zhejiang Bofay Elec Coof which business quality 39 · market factors 18 Lindeof which business quality 66 · market factors 60
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
21
51
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
62
51
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
34
64
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
70
69
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
42
70
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
52
87
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
5
48
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
4
52
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
0
100

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Zhejiang Bofay Elec Co

Earnings-Based¥2.21
Multiples¥3.00
Asset-Based¥6.87
Economic Profit¥4.29
Growth Earnings¥3.09

14 of 14 models see the stock below the current price.

Linde

DCF Models$211
Earnings-Based$132
Dividend Discount$116
Multiples$239
Asset-Based$55.42
Growth DCF$155
Economic Profit$156
Growth Earnings$204

26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Zhejiang Bofay Elec Co
Bear ¥2.25Fair Value ¥3.00Bull ¥3.75
¥25.31 = current price (white tick)
Linde
Bear $121Fair Value $222Bull $291
$491 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Zhejiang Bofay Elec Co · Materials

Quality score34 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside-88% · bottom 25%

Linde · Materials

Quality score70 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-55% · below median

Bottom line

As of Aug 12, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Linde as the less overvalued of the two: Zhejiang Bofay Elec Co trades at ¥25.31 versus a fair value of ¥3.00 (-88%), while Linde trades at $491 versus $222 (-55%).

Linde has the higher quality score (70/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.